PRISON INMATE INVENTORY
Objective and accurate inmate screening
Applications |
** Prison Inmate Inventory ** |
-
Potentially 1,300 adult correctional
institutions in the United States, which are operated as part of statewide
systems.
- Prison (penitentiary or reformatory) inmate (male and female) assessment.
-
Helps determine inmate risk, establish supervision levels and readiness for
status or classification changes.
-
Authenticates and confirms inmate needs.
|
The PII is designed for prison inmate (male and female) assessment. The PII is
an automated (computer-scored) assessment instrument or test. This document
describes the PII and explains how it works. It also discusses unique PII
features, explains PII scale interpretation and presents an example PII report.
Description
The PII is designed for prison inmate (male and female) assessment. The PII has
161 items and takes approximately 35 to 40 minutes to complete. PII reports are
scored and printed on-site. The PII has 10 measures (scales): 1. Truthfulness
Scale, 2. Violence (Lethality) Scale, 3. Antisocial Scale, 4. Adjustment Scale,
5. Self-Esteem Scale, 6. Judgment Scale, 7. Distress Scale, 8. Alcohol Scale,
9. Drugs Scale, and 10. Stress Coping Abilities Scale. The PII has been
standardized on thousands of inmates. It is a popular prison inmate screening
instrument or test.
Ten
PII Scales
The PII contains 10 separate measures (scales) that are standardized and normed
on the prison inmate (male and female) population. These include:
-
Truthfulness Scale:
Measures how truthful the inmate was while completing the test. It identifies
guarded and defensive inmates who attempt to minimize problems or fake their
answers. It identifies faking good.
-
Violence (Lethality) Scale:
Measures the use of force to injure, damage or destroy. It identifies inmates
that are dangerous to themselves and others.
-
Antisocial Scale:
Measures antisocial attitudes and behavior. It identifies inmates that are
opposed to society and social norms.
-
Adjustment Scale:
Measures the inmate’s ability to cope with incarceration. It evaluates
the inmate’s emotional and social adjustment.
-
Self-Esteem Scale:
Describes the person one believes oneself to be. This scale measures
inmate worthiness or feelings of self-worth.
-
Judgment Scale:
Measures an inmate’s ability to draw conclusions from events and the actions of
people around them. Inmate risk increases as judgment decreases.
-
Distress Scale:
Measures inmate discomfort, unhappiness and pain. Distress incorporates
anxiety, depression and concern.
-
Alcohol Scale:
Measures alcohol proneness and severity of alcohol-related problems. Alcohol
refers to beer, wine and other liquor.
-
Drugs Scale:
Measures drug abuse proneness and the severity of drug-related problems. Drugs
include marijuana, crack, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin.
-
Stress Coping Abilities Scale:
Measures an inmate’s ability to handle stress. Stress exacerbates emotional and
mental health symptoms. This is a non-introversive way to screen diagnosable
mental health problems.
The PII assesses attitudes and behaviors yielding an inmate profile.
Paper-pencil test administration takes on average 35 to 40 minutes, and tests
are computer scored on-site with reports printed within 3 minutes.
The PII was developed for inmate evaluation. It is much more than just another
alcohol or drug test; consequently, it measures important behaviors missed by
other tests.
PII Test Booklets
PII test booklets are provided free. These booklets contain 161 items
(true/false and multiple choice) and are written at a high 5th to
low 6th grade level. If a person can read the newspaper, they can
read the PII. It takes 35 to 40 minutes to complete this test. PII test
booklets are available in both English and Spanish.
PII Reports
In brief, PII reports summarize the inmate’s self-reported history, explain what
attained scores mean and offer specific score-related recommendations. An
example Prison Inmate Inventory (PII) report can be viewed by clicking on the
PII Example Report link.
Within 3 minutes of test data entry, automated (computer-generated) 4-page
reports are printed on-site. These reports summarize a lot of information in an
easily understood format. For example, these reports include a PII profile
(graph), which summarizes inmate findings at a glance. Also included are
attained scale scores, an explanation of what each score means and specific
score-related recommendations.
Significant items (direct admissions) are highlighted, and answers to the
built-in interview (the last section of multiple choice items) are presented.
Emphasis is placed on having meaningful reports that are helpful and easily
understood.
To go directly to the example PII report, click on the
PII Report link. After reviewing the report, you can return to this
section by clicking on the "Return to PII Reports Section" link.
Software
The PII is available in MS-DOS or Windows diskettes and CD's. MS-DOS diskettes
contain all their own software. Windows diskettes require a one-time computer
setup procedure after which PII data diskettes are used. Training manuals are
provided, and new test users can be walked through these procedures over Risk
& Needs Assessment, Inc.'s (Risk & Needs') telephone line.
Proprietary PII diskettes contain 25 or 50 test applications. These 3½" or 5¼"
diskettes score, interpret and print PII reports on-site. Once a PII account is
established, ordered diskettes are mailed to users. When all test applications
are used, diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs where the test data and
demographics are downloaded into the PII database for subsequent research
analysis. The proprietary "delete names" program is activated by the test user
with a few keystrokes to delete all inmates' names from diskettes before they
are returned to Risk & Needs. Deleting all inmates’ names
insures inmate confidentiality and compliance with HIPAA (federal
regulation 45 C.F.R. 164.501).
"Delete names program insures confidentiality"
The "PII: Orientation and Training Manual" explains how the PII works and should
be read by staff. The "PII: Computer Operating Guide" explains how to score
tests, print or store reports and discusses other unique PII computer-related
features.
PII
Database
The PII system contains a proprietary database. Earlier, it was noted that all
PII used diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs, and the test data along
with related demographics are downloaded into the PII database. This database
(over 85,000 PII tests) allows ongoing research and testing program summary --
capabilities that were not possible before. Ongoing research insures quality
control. Test program summaries provide program self-evaluation.
Built-in Database:
Permits ongoing research and annual program summary -- at no additional cost.
As discussed earlier, when the 25 or 50 tests on a diskette are used, that
diskette is returned to Risk & Needs, checked for any viruses and
downloaded into the expanding PII database. This proprietary database includes
over 85,000 inmates’ test data. Advantages of a built-in database are many and
include database (research) analysis and annual summary reports. Click on the Annual Summary Reports link to review an
example summary report.
Returned diskettes can be summarized on a state, correctional institution or
agency basis -- at no additional cost to users. Annual summary reports provide
information for testing program self-evaluation.
In summary, having all used PII test data centrally filed at Risk & Needs'
offices in the PII database has many advantages. Database analysis permits
ongoing cost efficient research that includes scale alpha coefficients,
frequency distributions, correlations, ANOVA, cross-tab statistics along with
reliability, validity and accuracy determinations. We continue to study the
effects of demographics and are undertaking recidivism prediction studies. A
Prison Inmate Inventory (PII) research study can be reviewed by clicking on the PII Research Study link.
Annual Summary Reports
Risk & Needs can access each of its tests' built-in databases for
statistical analysis and summarization of all tests administered in a year.
Annual Summary Reports are prepared for state, department, agency and even some
individual providers -- at no cost to them. These reports are provided as a
professional courtesy to large volume test users. Summary reports include
demographics, court-history when relevant, and test statistics (reliability,
validity and accuracy). Has anyone offered to summarize your testing program?
Annually? At no additional cost to you? Minimum testing volume for annual
reports is 350 tests. There is no maximum limit. Risk & Needs' annual
reports range in size from 350 tests to over 55,000 tests annually. An example
Annual Summary Report can be viewed by clicking on this Annual Summary Reports link.
Reliability, Validity and Accuracy
The PII has a built-in database that insures inclusion of all tests administered
in a confidential (no names) manner. Over 85,000 inmates’ test data are
represented in the PII database. And, these reliability, validity and accuracy
statistics are reported in the document titled "PII: An Inventory of Scientific
Findings." Annual database analysis has revealed that PII scales maintain very
high reliability coefficients and minimum interscale correlations.
For example, the internal consistencies (coefficient alphas) for PII scales are
reported here for 20,780 inmates screened in the year 2000. This is only one
among several year 2000 samples.
A PII research study is presented at the end of this webpage. To go directly to
this research, click on the PII Research Study link.
Reliability of the PII (N=20,780, 2000) |
PII Scales |
Coefficient
Alpha |
Significance
Level |
Truthfulness |
.89 |
p<.001 |
Adjustment |
.92 |
p<.001 |
Violence |
.89 |
p<.001 |
Antisocial |
.89 |
p<.001 |
Distress |
.89 |
p<.001 |
Alcohol |
.94 |
p<.001 |
Drugs |
.95 |
p<.001 |
Judgment |
.91 |
p<.001 |
Self-Esteem |
.91 |
p<.001 |
Stress Coping Abilities |
.91 |
p<.001 |
All PII scales have alpha coefficients well above the professionally accepted
standard of .75 and are highly reliable. All coefficient alphas are significant
at the p<.001 level. To review another research study, click on the PII Research Study link.
PII research extends over 15 years. Many studies have been conducted on
thousands (not just hundreds) of inmates using several validation methods.
Early studies used criterion measures and were validated with other tests,
e.g., Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) L-Scale, MMPI F-Scale,
SAQ-Adult Probation, 16-PF, MMPI Psychopathic Deviate Scale, Mac-Andrews, MAST,
MMPI Anxiety Scale, MAS (Taylor Manifest Anxiety) Scale, TSC-VII Scale, etc.
Much of this research is summarized in the document titled "PII: An Inventory
of Scientific Findings." Subsequently, many discriminant validity (first versus
multiple offenders) and predictive validity (treatment versus non-treatment)
database analysis studies support PII reliability and validity.
"Standardized on Thousands of Inmates"
PII norms are based on inmates which now exceed 85,000 individuals. These norms
are updated annually for each PII scale. Separate norms are available for
gender (males and females), ethnicity (Caucasian, Black and Hispanic) and
geographic (state-by-state) regions. This database research is ongoing.
Advantages of Screening
Screening or assessment instruments filter out individuals with serious problems
that may require referral for a more comprehensive evaluation and/or treatment.
This filtering system works as follows:
PII Risk Ranges |
Risk Category |
Risk Range
Percentile |
Total
Percentage |
Low Risk |
0 - 39% |
39% |
Medium Risk |
40 - 69% |
30% |
Problem Risk |
70 - 89% |
20% |
Severe
Problem |
90 - 100% |
11% |
Reference to the above risk range table shows that a problem is not identified
until a scale score is at the 70th percentile or higher. These risk
range percentiles are based upon the thousands of inmates that have taken the
PII. This procedure is eminently fair, and it avoids extremes, i.e.,
over-identification and under-identification of problems.
A state, department or corrections system policy might refer inmates with
serious problems (Severe Problem, 11%) for additional services. In this
example, 89% of the inmates screened would not be referred for additional (and
expensive) services.
Budgetary savings (dollars) would be large with no compromises in inmates
receiving appropriate evaluation and/or treatment services. Indeed, more
inmates would receive help. Without a screening program, there is usually more
risk of over or under-utilization of additional professional services.
The PII scales identify the areas they screen. And, these scales (measures) are:
1. Truthfulness Scale, 2. Violence (Lethality) Scale, 3. Antisocial Scale, 4.
Adjustment Scale, 5. Self-Esteem Scale, 6. Judgment Scale, 7. Distress Scale,
8. Alcohol Scale, 9. Drugs Scale and 10. Stress Coping Abilities Scale.
PII Endorsements
"Few tests are designed specifically for prison inmate evaluation which makes
the Prison Inmate Inventory rather special... After carefully reviewing the
PII’s normative research I am impressed. This test exceeds professional
reliability and validity standards... The PII has been standardized on
thousands of male and female inmates. I recommend this test without
reservation."
Experimental Psychologist, Arizona
"We are very pleased with the Prison Inmate Inventory as one of our standardized
assessment instruments. It has clearly helped us strengthen our offender
assessment process. It has contributed to better special reports for the Parole
Board and more appropriate screening and referral for treatment services in the
institutions...
We have found the PII to be more than an alcohol and drug abuse assessment
instrument. Our staff find very useful the areas assessed by the PII
particularly the violence, antisocial and stress coping scales. The validity
scale has also been a feature of the PII valued by staff.
Another benefit we value in the PII is the opportunity to better understand our
offender population through the development of a comprehensive database. The
PII database allows us to understand and examine our offender population in the
areas it assesses.
This letter is intended to reflect Missouri’s positive experience with the
Prison Inmate Inventory... We have recommended this assessment instrument to
other agencies."
Missouri Department of Corrections
Division of Offender Rehabilitation Services
|
* * * * *
Fairness
goes beyond reliability and validity. The term applies to test accuracy for
demographic groups like gender and ethnicity (race). The PII has been normed on
these demographic groups in states where correctional institutions use the PII.
This research is ongoing in nature. PII scale scoring equations are adjusted,
as warranted, on an annual basis to insure fairness.
Staff Member Input:
Some people advocate fully automated assessment. Risk & Needs does not. The
PII is to be used in conjunction with experienced staff judgment. When
available, court and corrections records should be reviewed because they can
contain important information not provided or incorrectly provided by the
inmate. Experienced staff should also interview the inmate. For these reasons,
the following statement is contained on each PII report: "Prison Inmate
Inventory or PII results are confidential and should be considered working
hypotheses. No diagnosis or decision should be based solely upon PII results.
The PII is to be used in conjunction with experienced staff judgment and review
of available records."
Unique PII Features
Truthfulness Scale:
Identifies denial, problem minimization and faking. It is now clear that many
inmates attempt to minimize their problems. A Truthfulness Scale is now a
necessary component in contemporary inmate tests. The PII Truthfulness Scale
has been validated with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI),
polygraph exams, other tests, truthfulness studies and experienced staff
judgment. The PII Truthfulness Scale has been demonstrated to be reliable,
valid and accurate. In some respects, the PII Truthfulness Scale is similar to
the MMPI’s L and F-Scales. It consists of a number of items that most people
agree or disagree with.
"Truthfulness Scale and Truth-Corrected Scores"
Truth-Corrected scores
have proven to be very important for assessment accuracy. This
proprietary truth correction program is comparable to the MMPI K-Scale
correction. The PII Truthfulness Scale has been correlated with the other 9
scales. The Truth Correction equation then converts raw scores to
Truth-Corrected scores. Truth-Corrected scores are more accurate than raw
scores. Raw scores reflect what the inmate wants you to know. Truth-Corrected
scores reveal what the inmate is trying to hide.
Stress Coping Abilities Scale:
Measures how well the inmate handles stress, tension and pressure. How well a
person handles stress can effect their adjustment and mental health. We now
know that stress exacerbates emotional and mental health symptomatology. This
scale is a non-introversive way to screen established (diagnosable) mental
health problems. An inmate scoring at or above the 90th percentile
on the Stress Coping Abilities Scale might be referred for a more comprehensive
evaluation, diagnosis and treatment plan. This important area of inquiry is
missed by other inmate screening tests.
More than just another alcohol
or drug test.
In addition to alcohol and drugs, the PII assesses other important areas of
inquiry like truthfulness, denial and faking, violence (lethality) proneness,
antisocial attitudes, self-esteem, feelings of distress and judgment. The
Stress Coping Abilities Scale was discussed earlier. The PII is specifically
designed for inmate (male and female) assessment. It provides the information
needed for understanding inmate attitudes and behavior.
"Alternative for reading impaired inmates"
Three ways to give the PII.
The PII can be administered in three different ways:
1.
Paper-pencil test booklet format is the most popular testing procedure. PII
English and Spanish test booklets and answer sheets are available at no added
cost.
2.
PII tests can be given directly on the computer screen. Some correctional
institutions dedicate computers for PII testing. And,
3.
Human voice audio in English and Spanish is available. This involves a
computer, a headset and the inmate uses the up-down arrow keys. As the inmate
goes from question to answer with the arrow keys, the question or answer is
highlighted on the monitor (screen) and simultaneously read to the inmate. The
three administration modes are discussed in the "PII: Orientation and Training
Manual." Each test administration mode has advantages and some limitations.
Risk & Needs offers these three testing modes so test users can select the
administration mode that is optimally suited to their needs.
Reading Impaired
Assessment:
Reading impaired inmates represent 20+ percent of inmates tested. This
represents a serious problem to many other inmate tests. In contrast, Risk
& Needs has developed an alternative for dealing with this problem: Human
Voice Audio.
Human Voice Audio:
Presentation of the PII in English and Spanish helps resolve many reading and
cultural difference issues. Inmates’ passive vocabularies are often greater
than their active vocabularies. Hearing items read out loud often helps reduce
both cultural and communication problems. This PII administration mode requires
a computer, earphones and simple instructions regarding how to operate the
up-down arrow keys on the computer keyboard.
Confidentiality:
Risk & Needs encourages test users to delete inmate names from diskettes
before they are returned to Risk & Needs. Once inmate names are deleted,
they are gone and cannot be retrieved. Deleting inmate names does not delete
demographics or test data, which is downloaded into the PII database for
subsequent analysis. This proprietary name deletion procedure involves a few
keystrokes and insures inmate confidentiality and compliance with
HIPAA (federal regulation 45 C.F.R. 164.501).
Test Data Input Verification:
Allows the person that inputs the test data from the answer sheet into the
computer to verify the accuracy of their data input. In brief, test data is
input twice, and any inconsistencies between the first and second data entries
are highlighted until corrected. When the first and second data entries match
or are the same, the staff person can continue. This proprietary Test Data
Input Verification procedure is optional, yet it is strongly recommended by
Risk & Needs.
Inventory of Scientific Findings:
Much of the PII research has been gathered together in one document titled
"PII: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." This document summarizes PII
research chronologically -- as the studies were completed. This innovative
chronological reporting format was established largely because of the PII
database, which permits annual database analysis of all tests administered. It
also allows the reader to observe the evolution of the PII into its current
state-of-the-art status.
Orientation and Training
Manual:
The PII: Orientation and Training Manual (O&T Manual) explains how the PII
works. This manual is a must read for staff that will be using the PII. O&T
Manual content includes, but is not limited to, the following: instructions for
testing, explanation of how scores are derived, description of how court and
corrections information is used, description of unique PII features and much
much more. The O&T Manual is comprehensive.
Computer Operating Guide:
Some computer operators want more information than others. Consequently, Risk
& Needs provides a One-Page Quick Start, which includes basic instructions
for scoring PII’s, and a more comprehensive PII: Computer Operating Guide. The
Computer Operating Guide contains instructions for using MS-DOS as well as
Windows software. This manual discusses hardware, software, scoring, printing
reports, unique program features and much more.
Optical Scanner Scoring:
Inmates' PII answer sheets can be "scanned" or automatically scored. This is
useful in high volume assessment centers and testing milieus. This option
requires scanner hardware. To insure accurate scanner scoring, Risk & Needs
likes to coordinate with staff that will be using the scanner to score PII
answer sheets. Risk & Needs' telephone number is
(602) 234-3506, our fax number
is
(602) 266-8227
and our e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com. Answer sheet scanning is discussed in depth in
the PII: Computer Operating Guide.
Staff Training:
Risk & Needs' staff are available to participate in PII training programs
conducted by correctional institutions in the United States. Risk & Needs'
staff typically participates in 4-hour or 6-hour PII training sessions. This
training can include hands-on computer scoring, as desired. Risk & Needs
gives attendees certificates attesting to their PII training.
Staff training is also provided on Fridays at Risk & Needs' Phoenix offices
from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. or from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These training
sessions are free. To participate, contact Risk & Needs at least ten days
in advance. Participation is on a first call, first scheduled basis.
Automated Criminogenic
Structured Interview (ACSI):
The ACSI is a structured interview, not a test. The ACSI consists of 65
multiple choice items. It obtains comprehensive background history, pattern of
substance (alcohol and other drugs) abuse and criminogenic needs information.
Whatever multiple choice item answer that is selected is printed in the ACSI
report. Use of the ACSI is voluntary (not required). The ACSI is
free. ACSI use is restricted
to users of Risk & Needs adult tests. The ACSI is
not
a test, and it is
not
to be used as a standalone test. The ACSI is a structured interview. For more
information on the ACSI and to see an ACSI report, click on this
ACSI link.
Why Select the PII?
The PII meets and exceeds most inmate screening criteria. It is endorsed by
users and is widely used in the United States. There are over 85,000 inmates’
PII test data in the PII database. The PII has repeatedly been demonstrated to
be reliable, valid and accurate. Ongoing research continues to study and adjust
for demographics like age, gender and ethnicity (race).
The PII's ten scales measure truthfulness, quantify the severity of alcohol and
drug abuse, assess violence (lethality) propensity, antisocial attitudes and
distress, as well as overall adjustment and self-esteem along with stress
coping abilities. Screening stress coping abilities allows non-introversive
identification of the presence of established (diagnosable) emotional and
mental health problems.
The PII's built-in database facilitates cost efficient database analysis and
annual testing program summary. These two unique features -- ongoing database
analysis and annual summary reports -- are provided free.
Inmates’ PII reports are timely (available on-site in 3½ minutes), readable and
easy to understand. Score-related recommendations are relevant. It’s reasonable
to conclude the PII is the state-of-the-art in contemporary inmate assessment
and screening. And, Risk & Needs doesn’t stop there! The PII is very
affordable.
"Free PII Examination Kit"
Test Unit Fee (Cost):
PII cost information can be reviewed by clicking on the Test Unit Fee (Cost) link. There is only
the one cost or charge, and that is the test unit fee. Everything else is
included at no additional cost to the test user. This includes test booklets,
answer sheets, training manuals, upgrades, ongoing database research, annual
summary testing reports, staff training, and support services. Do not be misled
by some test publishers' à la carte pricing like separate costs for each test
administration as well as for each of the test-related items listed above.
Instead of asking for the test administration cost, ask for the total cost
involved in using a test. We believe Risk & Needs' one test unit fee is
very affordable.
Free Examination Kit
A 1-test PII demonstration diskette is available on a 30-day cost free basis.
Demo diskettes are in MS-DOS format so that all the software is contained on
the diskette. This way, the one-time Windows setup program is avoided at the
demo level. This examination kit has a 1-test demo diskette, test booklet
(reusable), and an answer sheet (can photocopy), a PII: Orientation and
Training Manual, One-Page Quick Start and some descriptive materials. Risk
& Needs does want the demonstration diskette and test booklet returned
within 30 days. To request a free examination kit, click on the Free Examination Kit Request link.
How to Proceed
To become a Risk & Needs test user, click on the Agreement & Proposals link, click on the Print Client User Agreement button and fax the completed form to (602) 266-8227, or mail your completed form to Risk & Needs. Upon its receipt by Risk & Needs, you become a Risk & Needs test user and can order tests. Current Risk & Needs test users can reorder by mail, telephone, fax or e-mail.
Other related links are listed for reference. They are available as needed.
Test Unit Fee (Cost) webpage link.
Explains Risk & Needs' Test Unit Fees or Costs.
New Client Order webpage link. Explains
steps to become a "new Risk & Needs client."
How to Order webpage link. Explains how
Risk & Needs tests can be ordered.
Additional information can be provided upon request. Contact Risk & Needs
Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, Arizona 85064-4828. Risk &
Needs' telephone number is
(602) 234-3506,
our fax number is
(602) 266-8227
and our e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com.
Selecting an Inmate Screening Test
If you are selecting an inmate (male and female) assessment instrument, the
following Comparison Checklist should prove helpful. This checklist summarizes
important assessment and screening qualities. The "Other" column represents any
other test you might want to compare to the PII.
TEST COMPARISON CHECKLIST |
COMPARISON CATEGORIES |
PII |
Other |
Designed Specifically for Inmate Assessment |
Yes |
|
Standardized on Thousands of Prison Inmates |
Yes |
|
Test Reliability and Validity Research Provided |
Yes |
|
Test Completed in 40 Minutes |
Yes |
|
On-Site Reports within 3 Minutes |
Yes |
|
Truthfulness Scale Detects Faking |
Yes |
|
Truth-Corrected Scores Improve Accuracy |
Yes |
|
Three Test Administration Options |
Yes |
|
1. Paper-Pencil (English and
Spanish) |
Yes |
|
2. On Computer Screen (English and
Spanish) |
Yes |
|
3. Human Voice Audio (English and
Spanish) |
Yes |
|
Delete Client Names (insures
confidentiality) Program |
Yes |
|
HIPAA (federal
regulation) Compliant
|
Yes |
|
Comprehensive Assessment (10 scales or measures) |
Yes |
|
Violence (Lethality) Scale |
Yes |
|
Antisocial Scale |
Yes |
|
Alcohol and Drugs Scales |
Yes |
|
Distress Scale |
Yes |
|
Adjustment Scale |
Yes |
|
Self-Esteem Scale |
Yes |
|
Stress Coping Abilities Scale |
Yes |
|
Judgment Scale |
Yes |
|
Large (85,000+) Research Database |
Yes |
|
Available in MS-DOS and Windows |
Yes |
|
Helpful Score-Related Reports |
Yes |
|
Easily Understood Reports |
Yes |
|
ASAM Compatible Recommendations
|
Yes |
|
Staff Training (Free) |
Yes |
|
Examination Kit (Free) |
Yes |
|
Automated Criminogenic Structured Interview (Free) |
Yes |
|
Thirty-Day Money Back Guarantee |
Yes |
|
Very Affordable Test Unit Fee |
Yes |
|
"Multidimensional PII profiles"
PII Scale Interpretation
An example 4-page PII report follows this discussion of PII interpretation. It
is provided as a ready reference to augment this dialogue. There are several
levels of PII interpretation ranging from viewing the PII as a self-report to
interpreting scale elevations and scale interrelationships.
The following table is a starting point for interpreting PII scale scores.
PII Risk Ranges |
Risk Category |
Risk Range
Percentile |
Total
Percentage |
Low Risk |
0 - 39% |
39% |
Medium Risk |
40 - 69% |
30% |
Problem Risk |
70 - 89% |
20% |
Severe
Problem |
90
- 100% |
11% |
A problem is not identified until a scale score is at the 70th percentile
or higher.
Elevated
scale scores refer to percentile scores that are at or above the 70th
percentile.
Severe Problems
are identified by scale scores at or above the 90th percentile.
Severe problems represent the highest 11 percent of inmates evaluated with the
PII. The PII has been normed on over 85,000 inmates. And, this normative sample
continues to expand with each PII test that is administered.
SCALE INTERPRETATION
1.
Truthfulness
Scale:
Measures how truthful the inmate was while completing the test. It identifies
guarded and defensive inmates who attempt to fake good. Scores at or below the
89th percentile mean that all PII scales are accurate. Scale scores
in the 70th to 89th percentile range are accurate because
they have been Truth-Corrected. Scores at or above the 90th percentile
mean that all PII scales are inaccurate (invalid) because the inmate was overly
guarded, read things into test items that aren’t there, was minimizing
problems, or was caught faking answers. Inmates with reading impairments might
also score in this 90th to 100th percentile scoring
range. If not consciously deceptive, inmates with elevated Truthfulness Scale
scores are uncooperative, fail to understand test items or have a need to
appear in a good light. The Truthfulness Scale score is important because it
shows whether or not the inmate answered PII test items honestly. Truthfulness
Scale scores at or below the 89th percentile indicate that all other
PII scale scores are accurate. One of the first things to check when reviewing
a PII report is the Truthfulness Scale score.
2.
Violence (Lethality) Scale:
Identifies inmates that are dangerous to themselves and others. Violence
is defined as the expression of rage and hostility through physical force. It
is aggression in its most extreme and unacceptable form. Inmates having
elevated scores can be demanding, sensitive to perceived criticism and are
insightless about how they express their anger/hostility. Severe Problem
scorers should not be ignored, as they are threatening and very dangerous. A
particularly unstable and perilous situation involves an elevated Violence
Scale with an elevated Antisocial, Alcohol, Drugs or Judgment Scale score.
Substance abuse, antisocial attitudes and poor judgment can contribute to
dangerousness. The more of these scales that are elevated with the Violence
Scale, the worse the prognosis. An elevated Adjustment Scale or Stress Coping
Abilities Scale provides insight regarding co-determinants and possible
treatment recommendations. A Severe Problem Violence Scale score in conjunction
with an elevated Distress Scale and/or Self-Esteem Scale suggests suicidal
ideation should be explored. The Violence Scale score can be interpreted
independently or in combination with other PII scales.
3.
Antisocial Scale:
Measures antisocial attitudes and behavior. Antisocial is defined as
opposed to society or existing social organization and moral codes. Antisocial
behavior refers to aggressive, impulsive and sometimes violent actions that
flout social and ethical codes, such as laws, property rights, etc. This
behavior pattern often begins with a conduct disorder involving lying,
stealing, fighting, cruelty, truancy, vandalism, theft and substance abuse.
Elevated Antisocial Scale scores are often associated with non-internalization
of recognized conventions. Many high scorers manifest a seeming inability to
profit from experience. An elevated Antisocial Scale score in conjunction with
an elevated Alcohol Scale, Drugs Scale or Violence Scale score would be a
malignant sign prognostically. A Severe Problem Stress Coping Ability Scale
score with an elevated Severe Problem Antisocial Scale suggests the possibility
of a suspicious/paranoid mental health problem. Continuing, a Severe Problem
Self-Esteem Scale score and/or Distress Scale score accompanying a Severe
Problem Antisocial Scale score could be a suicidal ideation or explosiveness
warning. The elevations of the Self-Esteem and Antisocial Scales would help
determine if the inmate’s hostility is internalized (self-esteem) or
externalized (antisocial). An accompanying elevated Judgment Scale score would
be another malignant prognostic sign. The Antisocial Scale can be interpreted
independently or in combination with other PII scales.
4.
Adjustment Scale:
Measures the inmate’s ability to adjust to incarceration, which can be a very
stressful experience. Inmate adjustment requires modification of the inmate’s
attitudes and behavior. Stressors vary widely from a controlled environment
(along with frustration, humiliation and monotony) to a myriad of emotion
provoking events. When the Adjustment Scale is elevated, review other PII
scales. For example, is the inmate also dangerous (Violence Scale), antisocial
(Antisocial Scale), suffering from a substance abuse (Alcohol and Drugs Scales)
problem, or manifesting poor feelings of self-worth (Self-Esteem Scale)? An
elevated Adjustment Scale suggests one level of intervention; whereas, an
Adjustment Scale score in the Severe Problem range suggests other intervention
options. An elevated Adjustment Scale score with an elevated Distress Scale
score is suggestive of environmental conflict. Similarly, elevated Alcohol
and/or Drugs Scale scores could identify focal issues impacting upon the
inmate’s adjustment. The Adjustment Scale can be interpreted independently or
in combination with other PII scales.
5.
Self-Esteem:
Measures an inmate’s feelings of self-worth. This scale is a reflection of the
inmate’s self-acceptance, self-approval, and self-respect. The concept of self
evolves from self-evaluation of one’s ability, personal worth, attainment of
goals and achieving one’s potential. The circumstances preceding their
incarceration and present environmental milieu results in many inmates having
impaired self-esteem. This is another example of the importance of
standardizing the PII on inmates. Self-Esteem Scale scores are based on
thousands of inmates' scores. An elevated (70th to 89th percentile)
Self-Esteem Scale score indicates impaired self-esteem; whereas, scores in the
Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range reflect
established feelings of worthlessness and loss of self-respect. An elevated
Self-Esteem Scale score with Adjustment and/or Distress Scale score even higher
is suggestive of severe environmental conflict or suicidal ideation. In
contrast, concurrently elevated Judgment, Antisocial or Violence Scale scores
are often associated with acting out. When these scales are higher than the
Self-Esteem Scale (e.g., in the Severe Problem range), they suggest a very
dangerous inmate. The ubiquitous nature of self-esteem in the clinical
literature emphasizes its importance in inmate intervention/treatment
programming. And, as discussed earlier, the Self-Esteem Scale can be
interpreted independently or in combination with other scales.
6.
Judgment Scale:
Measures an inmate’s ability to formulate opinions or draw conclusions from the
actions of people and events around them. Distortions in judgment are often
maladaptive and based on faulty motives due to peer pressure, concrete
thinking, psychopathology or infantile wishes. Judgment Scale scores indicate
the types of decisions inmates make in their lives. The relationship between
"judgment" and "intelligence" is an empirical question that needs further
study. However, we know that very high (Severe Problem) Judgment Scale scores
may result from an inmate not understanding test items, which is usually
detected by the Truthfulness Scale score. It also appears that Judgment Scale
scores are often interactive with other PII scale scores. In general, as
judgment decreases, inmate risk increases. The Judgment Scale can also be
interpreted independently of other scales.
7.
Distress Scale:
Measures inmate discomfort, unhappiness and pain. Distressed inmates are very
concerned, bothered and upset. Distress is one of the most common reasons
people initiate counseling or psychotherapy. And, it often serves as the
beginning point in clinical inquiry. The magnitude of the Distress Scale is
important. Elevated scores indicate something is wrong. Distress Scale scores
in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range
indicate the inmate is hurting, overwhelmed and desperate. A Severe Problem
Distress Scale score in conjunction with a Severe Problem Self-Esteem Scale
and/or Stress Coping Abilities Scale suggests very serious emotional problems
and is usually a malignant sign. The Distress Scale can also be interpreted
independently of other PII scales.
8.
Alcohol Scale:
Measures alcohol use and the severity of abuse. Alcohol refers to beer, wine
and other liquor. It is a licit substance. An elevated (70th to 89th
percentile) Alcohol Scale score is indicative of an emerging drinking problem.
An Alcohol Scale score in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th
percentile) range identifies serious drinking problems.
Since a history of alcohol problems could result in an abstainer (current
non-drinker) attaining a Low to Medium Risk score, precautions have been built
into the PII to correctly identify "recovering alcoholics." Several PII items
are printed in the "Significant Items" and again in the "Multiple Choice" (page
4) sections of the PII report for quick reference. These "recovering alcohol"
items include the following: inmate substance abuse history (item 137),
drinking self-description (item 140), inmate’s desire for alcohol treatment
(item 141), inmate’s self-admission to a drinking problem (item 142), and the
inmate’s answer to the "recovering alcoholic" question (item 143). In addition,
the risk range paragraphs (printed for elevated Alcohol Scale scores) clearly
state that the inmate may be a "recovering alcoholic."
In intervention and/or treatment settings, the inmate’s Alcohol Scale score
helps staff work through inmate denial. Most inmates accept the objective and
standardized Alcohol Scale score as accurate and relevant. This is particularly
true when it is explained that elevated scores don’t occur by chance. The
inmate must answer a definite pattern of alcohol-related admissions for an
elevated score to occur. And, Alcohol Scale scores are based on thousands of
inmates who have completed the PII.
An elevated Alcohol Scale score in conjunction with other elevated scores
magnifies the severity of the other elevated scores when the inmate drinks. For
example, if you have an inmate with an elevated Violence Scale who also has an
elevated Alcohol Scale score, that inmate is even more dangerous when drinking.
When both Alcohol and Drugs Scales are elevated, the higher score represents the
inmate’s substance of choice. When both are in the Severe Problem range,
explore polysubstance abuse. The Alcohol Scale can also be interpreted
independently.
9.
Drugs Scale:
Measures drug use and the severity of abuse. Drugs refer to marijuana, cocaine,
crack, ice, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. These are illicit
substances. An elevated (70th to 89th percentile) Drugs
Scale score is indicative of an emerging drug problem. A Drugs Scale score in
the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range
identifies serious illicit drug abusers.
Similar to the Alcohol Scale, a history of drug-related problems could result in
an abstainer (drug history, but not presently using or abusing drugs) attaining
a Low to Medium Risk score. Precautions have been built into the PII to
correctly identify "recovering drug abusers." Several PII items are printed in
the "Multiple Choice" and again in the "Structured Interview" (page 4) sections
of PII reports for easy reference. These "recovering drug abuser" items include
the following: inmate substance abuse history (item 137), drug use
self-description (item 140), admission to a current drug problem (item 142),
inmate’s answer to the "recovering drug abuser" question (item 143), and
self-description of the inmate’s drug use (item 144). In addition, the elevated
Drugs Scale score paragraphs (in the PII report) clearly state that the inmate
may be a "recovering" drug abuser.
In intervention and treatment settings, the inmate's Drugs Scale score helps
staff work through inmate denial in a similar way as explained earlier for the
Alcohol Scale. And, an elevated Drugs Scale score in conjunction with other
elevated scale scores magnifies the severity of the other elevated scores when
the inmate uses drugs. For example, an elevated Violence Scale in conjunction
with an elevated Drugs Scale score increases the severity and risk associated
with the Violence Scale when the inmate uses drugs.
When both the Drugs and Alcohol Scales are elevated, the higher score represents
the inmate’s substance of choice. When both are in the Severe Problem range,
explore polysubstance abuse. The Drugs Scale can also be interpreted
independently.
10.
Stress Coping Abilities Scale:
Measures how well the inmate copes with stress. It is now accepted that
stress exacerbates symptoms of mental and emotional problems. Thus, an elevated
Stress Coping Abilities Scale score in conjunction with other elevated PII
scales helps explain the inmate’s situation. When an inmate doesn’t handle
stress well, other existing problems are often exacerbated. Such problem
augmentation applies to substance abuse, behavioral acting-out and attitudinal
problems.
An elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score can also exacerbate emotional
and mental health symptomatology. When a Stress Coping Abilities Scale score is
in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range,
it is very likely that the inmate has a diagnosable mental health problem. In
these instances, referral to a certified/licensed mental health professional is
warranted for a diagnosis and treatment plan. Lower elevated scores suggest
possible referral alternatives like stress management counseling. The Stress
Coping Abilities Scale score can be interpreted independently or in combination
with other PII scales.
* * * * *
In conclusion, it was noted that there are several "levels" of PII
interpretation ranging from viewing the PII as a self-report to interpreting
scale elevations and interrelationships. Staff can then put PII test report
findings within the context of the inmate’s life and corrections situation.
Additional PII information can be provided upon request. Risk & Needs'
telephone number is
(602) 234-3506,
our fax number is
(602) 266-8227
and our e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com.
AN EXAMPLE PII REPORT FOLLOWS
The
first page
of the PII Report begins with the inmate's name and some basic demographics.
The PII profile enables staff to understand the inmate's PII results at a
glance. From left to right, scale names are followed by the attained percentile
score and its graphic presentation. Page one ends with an inmate's
self-reported court history. Considerable insight can be provided by comparing
the inmate's self-report with their official records.
PRISON INMATE INVENTORY
* * * * * * * * * * * *
NAME : Mr.
Example
CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
Inmate Number : 00000000000
AGE : 21 SEX:
Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
ETHNICITY/RACE:
Caucasian
DATE OF BIRTH : 01/01/1983
HIGHEST GRADE ATTAINED:
12
DATE SCORED : 12/11/2004
Prison Inmate Inventory or PII results are confidential and should
be
considered working hypotheses. No diagnosis or decision should be based
solely upon PII results. The PII is to be used in conjunction with ex-
perienced staff judgment and review of available records.
MEASURES
%ile
PII PROFILE
--------
---- +---------------+-----------+-------+---+
- LOW RISK - MEDIUM
-PROBLEM-MAX-
-
-
- - -
TRUTHFULNESS
32
*************...-...........-.......-...-
-
-
- - -
ADJUSTMENT
72
*****************************.......-...-
-
-
- - -
ALCOHOL
39
****************-...........-.......-...-
-
-
- - -
DRUGS
29
************....-...........-.......-...-
-
-
- - -
ANTISOCIAL
72
*****************************.......-...-
-
-
- - -
VIOLENCE
92
*************************************...-
-
-
- - -
DISTRESS
58
************************....-.......-...-
-
-
- - -
JUDGMENT
72
*****************************.......-...-
-
-
- - -
SELF-ESTEEM
80
*********************************...-...-
-
-
- - -
STRESS COPING
65
***************************.-.......-...-
+---------------+-----------+-------+---+
0
40
70 90 100
----------- PERCENTILE SCORES -----------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY INMATE
-----------------------------------------
Age at first arrest.......... 17 Years in jail and prison.........
1
Felony arrests............... 1 Alcohol-related
arrests.......... 0
Times on probation........... 1 Drug-related
arrests............. 0
Probation revocations........ 0 DUI/DWI
arrests.................. 0
Times on parole.............. 0 Jail/Prison escape
attempts...... 0
Parole revocations........... 0 Months left to
serve............. 4
Total number of arrests...... 5
Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
PII Copyright (c) 1991, 1998, PII Software Copyright (c) 1991, 1998
|
The
second page
of the PII report presents six scale paragraphs. Each paragraph gives the
inmate's attained score, explains what that score means and sets forth specific
score-related recommendations. These six paragraphs include: Truthfulness
Scale, Adjustment Scale, Alcohol Scale, Drugs Scale, Antisocial Scale and the
Violence (Lethality) Scale.
NAME: Example
Report
-2- PII
REPORT
* * SUMMARY PARAGRAPHS EXPLAINING INMATE'S ATTAINED SCALE SCORES * *
------------------------------------------------------------
TRUTHFULNESS SCALE: LOW RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:32
This is an accurate PII profile and other scale scores are
accurate.
Denial and distortion are minimal. This inmate was truthful
and has
adequate reading skills. The Truthfulness Scale
identifies self-
protective, recalcitrant and guarded inmates who minimize
and even
conceal information. This inmate was truthful. This test is accurate.
ADJUSTMENT SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:72
This inmate's Adjustment Scale score is in the problem risk
(70 to
89th percentile) range. An early and frequent arrest record is likely.
PII Alcohol Scale and Drug Scale scores should be reviewed. Indicators
of a negative attitude, impaired interpersonal
relationships and
behavioral difficulties are evident. Noncompliance,
whether of a
passive-aggressive obstructionistic or more openly resistant nature is
possible. Consideration might be given to
alerting staff to the
inmate's adjustment difficulties. This inmate is problem prone.
ALCOHOL SCALE: LOW RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:39
Few, if any, indicators of alcohol (beer, wine or liquor)
abuse are
evident. Alcohol use, if present, may be
historical or represent
minimal involvement. Alcohol abuse risk is low. A person who does not
drink may score higher than zero, but would score in
the low risk
range. With regard to alcohol, this is a low risk score.
DRUGS SCALE: LOW RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:29
Few, if any, significant indicators of illicit drug use or abuse
are
evident. Drug involvement may be historical, experimental or minimal.
An inmate who does not use drugs may score above zero, but would still
score in the low risk range. Drugs refers to
marijuana, cocaine,
crack, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. With regard to
drugs,
this is a low risk score.
ANTISOCIAL SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:72
An established pattern of antisocial behavior is evident. Problem risk
scorers often have difficulty maintaining responsible
relationships
and loyalties. They are often callous, irresponsible, distressed
and
lack empathy. Many are boastful, deceitful, antisocial and
given to
tantrums. Poor work histories are common. This is a problem risk
(70
to 89th percentile) Antisocial Scale score.
VIOLENCE SCALE: MAXIMUM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:92
Violent tendencies are indicated and a pattern of violence appears to
be well established. This inmate could be dangerous to self or others.
Ruthlessness, destructiveness, savageness and
explosiveness are
common. This is a violent person. This inmate can be
intimidating,
threatening and potentially dangerous. Review this inmate's
records
carefully for prior violent acts.
|
The
third page
of the PII report completes the summary paragraphs on the Distress Scale,
Judgment Scale, Self-Esteem Scale and the Stress Coping Abilities Scale. Each
of these paragraphs gives the inmate's attained score, explains what that score
means and provides specific score-related recommendations. Page 3 concludes
with the "Significant Items" for the Alcohol, Drugs, Antisocial and Violence
(Lethality) Scales. A significant item is a direct admission or an unusual
answer.
NAME: Example
Report
-3-
PII REPORT
DISTRESS SCALE: MEDIUM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:58
Periods of anxiety and depression are reported. Environmental (incar-
ceration) stress and interpersonal conflict
can be contributing
factors. Distress may be dissipated during anger, physical
exercise,
eating or sleep. This inmate is not overwhelmed by
distress. With
regard to distress, this is a medium risk score.
JUDGMENT SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:72
Below average or perhaps impaired judgment is
indicated. Impaired
judgment is sometimes related to cultural factors, language difficul-
ties, emotionality, intellectual functions, substance abuse
or con-
crete thinking. This inmate may be easily confused and lacks
under-
standing or comprehension.
SELF-ESTEEM SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:80
This inmate's self-esteem is negative. This person devalues himself or
herself, feels inadequate and lacks confidence. Such persons are often
moody, worrisome and insecure. Although negative self-esteem is indi-
cated, it may not be the most significant focal area of
difficulty.
This is a problem risk Self-Esteem Scale score.
STRESS COPING SCALE: MEDIUM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:65
Stress coping abilities are not well established, however, stress does
not present as a focal issue. Stress-related problems are
character-
ized by irritability, instability and interpersonal conflict.
Coping
with stress is a process of adaptation. Symptoms of
stress can be
psychological or physiological and can include anxiety,
depression,
irritability, substance abuse and moodiness. With regard
to stress
coping abilities, this is a medium risk score.
* * * * *
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS are either direct admissions or unusual
responses
that may warrant clarification for better inmate understanding.
ALCOHOL
DRUGS
-------
-----
2. Is concerned about drinking 64. Drug use concern
after prison
ANTISOCIAL
VIOLENCE
----------
--------
15. Anything is OK if not caught 3. More angry & violent
than most
31. People think is antisocial 34. Often thinks about
revenge
36. Admits manipulates and lies 40. Dangerous, angry,
violent, etc.
54. Needless lying and conning 44. When angered is
dangerous
83. Concern about being antisocial 51. Feels justified hurting someone
55. Physical cruelty to others
59. Admits is a violent person
68. Has threatened or hurt others
74. More dangerous than most people
87. Denies is a nonviolent person
|
The
fourth page
of the PII report begins with the multiple choice (items 127 through
145, Section 3). These are four choice items, and the answer selected by the
inmate to each of these items is presented on page 4 of the PII report.
Sometimes, comparison of the inmate's subjective answers with their empirically
based scale scores provides insight into the inmate's attitude and motivation.
Space is then provided for staff Recommendations and/or Comments, staff
signature, ID number and date. The PII report concludes with a reproduction of
the inmate's answers to all of the PII items. The summary of the PII responses
aids staff identification of inmate's answers to specific items of interest.
NAME: Example
Report
-4-
PII REPORT
SECTION 3 reflects the inmate's opinions with all their biases.
These
answers allow comparison of the inmate's subjective opinions with their
more objective and empirically based scale scores.
127. No complaints or grievances 139. No inmate/officer
problems
128. Last year: not disciplined 140. Drinking not a
problem
129. No job or trouble problems 141. No need for
alcohol help
131. Denies suicidal or homicidal 142. No drinking or drug problem
133. No family/relationship prob. 143. Not a recovering sub. abuser
135. No disciplinary action(6 mon.) 144. Drug use a mild problem
137. No substance abuse programs 145. No need for drug
treatment
RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: ______________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
__________________________ ___________________
__________
STAFF MEMBER SIGNATURE BADGE NUMBER OR
ID# DATE (TEST #1)
PII RESPONSES
--- ---------
1- 50 FTTFTFFFFF TFFTTFTFTT FFFTFTFTFT TFTTFTFTFT FFTTFFFTTF
51-100 TTTTTFTFTF FTTTTFTTFF TTFTTTFFFF FTTTTTFT33 3131214222
101-150 3412211212 2222121421 3112224443 4343414344 4443422232
151-161 2232212132 3
Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
PII Copyright (c) 1991, 1998, PII Software Copyright (c) 1991, 1998
|
|