ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION
II
Designed for Juvenile (Male & Female) Assessment
The ACDI-Corrections
Version II is a comprehensive juvenile (male and female) assessment
or screening test. It is used in juvenile courts (drug courts, family courts,
municipal courts, etc.), probation departments, community corrections and
treatment programs. If the intent is to identify disturbed and/or violent
juveniles so they can be helped, you should consider the ACDI-Corrections
Version II. It is appropriate for misdemeanor and felony cases. The
ACDI-Corrections Version II has impressively demonstrated reliability, validity
and accuracy.
Applications
|
** ACDI-Corrections Version II **
|
-
Juvenile courts
-
Family and juvenile drug courts
-
Juvenile (male and female) probation departments
-
Juvenile assessment, counseling and treatment agencies
-
Juvenile community corrections
|
Description
The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) is an
automated (computer-scored) juvenile assessment instrument or test. It consists
of 140 items and takes 25 to 30 minutes to complete. Version II contains seven
measures (scales): 1. Truthfulness Scale,
2. Alcohol Scale, 3. Drugs
Scale, 4. Violence (Lethality)
Scale, 5. Distress Scale,
6. Adjustment Scale and 7. Stress
Coping Abilities Scale.
Seven Scales (Measures)
The seven ACDI-Corrections Version II scales are
described as follows:
-
Truthfulness Scale:
Measures the juvenile’s truthfulness while completing the test. It identifies
denial, guardedness, problem minimization and faking. The Truthfulness Scale
detects faking good.
-
Alcohol Scale:
Measures alcohol use, the severity of abuse and the presence of alcohol-related
problems. "Alcohol" refers to beer, wine and other liquors.
-
Drugs Scale:
Measures illicit drug use and the severity of abuse. "Drugs" refers to
marijuana (pot), crack, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. This
scale is independent of the Alcohol Scale described above.
-
Violence (Lethality)
Scale: Measures the use of force to injure, damage or destroy. This
scale identifies the youth’s danger to self and others.
-
Distress Scale:
Measures strain imposed by pain, worry, anxiety, depression, physical torment
or suffering. Distress is the most common reason for juveniles to seek
counseling.
-
Adjustment Scale:
Measures the youth’s ability to adapt, conform and function. This scale
recognizes personal and social stressors at home, at school and in authority
relationships. It incorporates personal and social forces involved in adapting
to one’s environment.
-
Stress Coping Abilities
Scale: Measures the youth’s ability to cope with
stress, anxiety and pressure. Stress exacerbates symptoms of emotional and
mental health problems. This scale is a non-introversive way to screen for the
presence of established emotional and mental health problems.
ACDI: THE SHORTER 5
SCALE VERSION
As noted earlier, the ACDI-Corrections Version II,
or Version II, has 7 measures (scales), consists of 140 items, has a Violence (Lethality)
Scale and takes 30 minutes to complete. The Adolescent Chemical Dependency
Inventory, or ACDI, is a shorter version (105 items), does not have the
Violence (Lethality) Scale
and takes 15 to 20 minutes to complete. The ACDI has 5 scales (measures):
1. Truthfulness
Scale,
2. Adjustment Scale,
3. Distress Scale, 4.
Alcohol Scale, 5. Drugs Scale. To go directly to
the ACDI web page, click on the ACDI link. The choice is yours.
* * * * *
Why use the ACDI-Corrections Version II? While
adult crime rates have recently fallen across the U.S., they have risen among
the nation's youth. For example, as the adult arrest rate for murder fell from
1978 to 1993, the juvenile murder rate rose by 77%. And, at the same time, the
arrest rate of youth for all violent crimes climbed 79%. These statistics
underscore the need for meaningful and accurate juvenile assessment.
Early detection of troubled youths' problems facilitates quicker intervention
and treatment. This type of information also helps in deciding upon
counseling, treatment, probation, levels of supervision and incarceration
alternatives. The ACDI-Corrections Version II is designed to meet these needs.
It is much more than just another alcohol or drug test. Version II’s seven
scales (measures) acquire important information often missed by other tests.
"Appropriate for
Misdemeanor and Felony Offenders"
At one sitting of approximately 30 minutes in
duration, staff can acquire a vast amount of juvenile-related information,
which includes attitudes, substance abuse involvement, acting out (violence)
propensity, perceived distress and coping behaviors. Early problem
identification facilitates timely intervention and improved treatment results.
Advantages of Screening
Screening or assessment instruments filter out
individuals with serious problems that may re-quire referral for a more
comprehensive evaluation and/or treatment. This filtering system works as
follows:
ACDI-Corrections Version
II Risk Ranges
|
Risk Category
|
Risk Range
Percentile
|
Total
Percentage
|
Low Risk
|
0 - 39%
|
39%
|
Medium Risk
|
40 - 69%
|
30%
|
Problem Risk
|
70 - 89%
|
20%
|
Severe Problem
|
90 - 100%
|
11%
|
Reference to the above Risk Range table shows that
a problem is not identified until a scale score is at the 70th percentile or
higher. These risk range percentiles are based upon the thousands of troubled
youths that have taken the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This procedure is
eminently fair, and it avoids extremes, i.e., over-identification and
under-identification of problems and risk.
A state, department, juvenile court, family and
juvenile drug court or agency policy might refer clients with identified
problems for further evaluation, intervention or treatment. In this case, 31%
of the youths screened (Problem Risk and Severe Problem) would be referred. Or,
policy might only refer clients with serious problems (Severe Problem, 11%) for
additional services. In these examples, 69% or 89% (contingent upon adopted
policy) of the people screened would not be referred for additional (and
expensive) services.
Budgetary savings
(dollars) would be large with no compromises in needy youths receiving
appropriate evaluation and/or treatment services. Indeed,
more needy youths would receive help. Without a screening program, there is
usually more risk of over or under-utilization of additional professional
services.
The ACDI-Corrections Version II scales identify
the areas it screens. And, these scales (measures) are:
1. Truthfulness Scale, 2. Alcohol
Scale, 3. Drugs Scale,
4. Violence (Lethality) Scale, 5.
Distress Scale, 6. Adjustment Scale and
7. Stress Coping Abilities Scale.
Test Booklets
ACDI-Corrections Version II test booklets are
provided free. These booklets contain 140 items (true/false and multiple
choice) and are written at a 5th to 6th grade reading level. If a person can
read the newspaper, they can read the ACDI-Corrections Version II. It takes on
average 25 to 30 minutes to complete this test. Test booklets are available in
English and Spanish.
Reports
In brief, ACDI-Corrections Version II reports
summarize the youth’s self-reported history, explain what attained scale scores
mean and offer specific score-related recommendations.
Within 2½ minutes of test data entry, automated
(computer-scored) 4-page reports are printed on-site. These reports summarize a
lot of information in an easily understood format. For example, these reports
include a Version II profile (graph), which summarizes troubled youth findings
at a glance. Also included are attained scale scores, an explanation of what
each score means and specific score-related recommendations. In addition,
significant items (direct admissions) are highlighted, and answers to a
built-in interview (last sequence of multiple choice items) are presented.
Emphasis is placed on having meaningful reports that are helpful and easily
understood. To go directly to the example ACDI-Corrections Version II report
click on the
ACDI-Corrections Version II Report link. After reviewing the report you
can return to this section by clicking on the "Return to ACDI-CV II Reports
Section" link.
"Provides a sound empirical basis for
decisions"
Software
The ACDI-Corrections Version II is available on
MS-DOS or Windows diskettes. MS-DOS diskettes contain all their own software.
Windows diskettes require a one-time computer setup procedure after which
Version II data diskettes are used to score and print reports. Training manuals
are provided, and new test users can be walked through these scoring procedures
over Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc.'s (Risk & Needs') telephone line at
(602) 234-3506.
Proprietary ACDI-Corrections Version II diskettes
(Version II) contain 25 or 50 test applications. These 3½" or 5¼" diskettes
score, interpret and print reports on-site. Once an ACDI-Corrections Version II
account is established, ordered diskettes are filled and mailed to users.
Approximately 97% of orders are filled and mailed back to users the same day.
When all test applications are used, diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs
where the demographics (age, gender, and ethnicity) and test data are
downloaded into Version II’s database for subsequent database analysis. The
proprietary "delete names" program is activated by the test user with a few
keystrokes to delete all juvenile names from diskettes before they are returned
to Risk & Needs. Deleting all juvenile names insures protection of each
youth’s confidentiality and compliance with HIPAA (federal regulation 45 C.F.R.
164.501).
The ACDI-Corrections Version II Orientation and
Training Manual explains how the Version II system works and should be read by
staff. The Version II Computer Operating Guide explains how to score tests,
print or store reports and discusses other unique ACDI-Corrections Version II
computer-related features.
Database
The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II)
system contains a proprietary built-in database. Earlier, it was noted that all
Version II used diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs and the test data is
downloaded into the Version II database. This expanding database allows ongoing
research and test program summary features that were not available before.
Ongoing research insures quality control. Testing program summaries provide for
program self-evaluation.
Built-in database.
Version II permits ongoing research and annual program summary -- at no
additional cost. As discussed earlier, when the 25 or 50-test diskettes are
used, these diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs, checked for viruses and
downloaded into the expanding Version II database. Advantages of this
proprietary database are many and include database (research) analysis and
annual testing program summary reports.
Returned diskettes can be summarized on a state,
department or agency basis -- at no additional cost to users. Annual summary
reports provide information that permits testing program review. To critique an
example summary report, click on the Annual Summary Reports link.
In summary, having all returned ACDI-Corrections
Version II test data centrally filed at Risk & Needs' offices in the
Version II database has many advantages. Database analysis permits ongoing cost
efficient research that includes scale alpha coefficients, ANOVA, frequency
distributions, correlations, and cross-tab statistics along with reliability,
validity and accuracy determinations.
Annual Summary Reports
Risk & Needs can access each of its tests'
built-in databases for statistical analysis and summarization of all tests
administered in a year. Annual Summary Reports are prepared for state,
department, agency and even some individual providers -- at no cost to them.
These reports are provided as a professional courtesy to large volume test
users. Summary reports include demographics, court-history when relevant, and
test statistics (reliability, validity and accuracy). Has anyone offered to
summarize your testing program? Annually? At no additional cost to you? Minimum
testing volume for annual reports is 350 tests. There is no maximum limit. Risk
& Needs' annual reports range in size from 350 tests to over 55,000 tests
annually. An example Annual Summary Report can be viewed by clicking on this Annual Summary Reports link.
Reliability, Validity and Accuracy
The ACDI-Corrections Version II has a built-in
proprietary database that insures inclusion of all administered tests in a
confidential (no names) manner. Over 52,000 juveniles’ test data are
represented in the ACDI and ACDI-Corrections Version II database. These
reliability, validity and accuracy statistics are reported in the document
titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." Annual database analysis
demonstrates that ACDI-Corrections Version II scales have very high reliability
coefficients with minimum interscale correlations.
For example, internal consistencies (alpha
coefficients) for ACDI-Corrections Version II scales are reported in the
following table for some troubled youth (N=2,180) screened in the year 2002.
This is only one among many year 2002 samples.
Reliability of the ACDI-CV II (N=2,180, 2002) |
ACDI-Corrections
Version II Scales
|
Alpha
Coefficient
|
Significance
Level
|
Truthfulness
|
.86
|
p<.001
|
Alcohol
|
.90
|
p<.001
|
Drugs
|
.89
|
p<.001
|
Violence (Lethality)
|
.85
|
p<.001
|
Distress
|
.88
|
p<.001
|
Adjustment
|
.85
|
p<.001
|
Stress Coping
|
.90
|
p<.001
|
All Version II scales have alpha coefficients well
above the professionally accepted standard of .75 and are highly reliable. All
alpha coefficients are significant at the p<.001 level.
ACDI-Corrections Version II research extends over
12 years. Many studies have been conducted on thousands of juveniles using
several validation methods. Early studies used criterion measures and were
validated with other tests, e.g., Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
(MMPI) L-Scale and F-Scale, 16PF, Juvenile Profile, MMPI MacAndrews Scale, MMPI
Psychopathic Deviate, MMPI Taylor Manifest Anxiety, MMPI Depression Scale, MMPI
Manifest Hostility Scale, MMPI Delinquency Scale, MMPI Family Discord Scale,
etc.
Much of this research is summarized in the
document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." Subsequently, many
discriminant and predictive validity database analysis based studies support
Version II's reliability, validity and accuracy. ACDI-Corrections Version
II norms are based on over 52,000 juveniles (male and female). These norms are
updated annually for each Version II scale. And, separate norms are available
for gender (male and female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, Black, Hispanic). This
database research is ongoing. To review an ACDI-Corrections Version II Research
Study, click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Research
Study link.
Relationships between ACDI and
ACDI-Corrections Version II scales
The ACDI-Corrections Version II is a corrections
version of the ACDI where the Violence Scale was added, but the other scales
remained the same. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients between ACDI
scale scores and ACDI-Corrections Version II scale scores are presented in the
table below.
Scales
|
Truthfulness Scale
|
Alcohol
Scale
|
Drugs
Scale
|
Adjustment
Scale
|
Distress
Scale
|
Correlation
Coefficient |
r = .99
|
r = .99
|
r = .99
|
r = .99
|
r = .98
|
Two different samples of juveniles were used in
this correlation analysis, and each youth took only the ACDI or the
ACDI-Corrections Version II. To test the correlation between scale scores, the
data for each scale was sorted in ascending order. This type of correlation was
used because different respondents took different tests. But, because the
scales and respondents were similar, the correlations are meaningful. There
were 2,084 youths included in this analysis (1,042 for each test). Such high
correlation coefficients demonstrate that ACDI and ACDI-Corrections Version II
scales are reliable and valid.
Research Publication:
Nebraska Probation Department's Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) selection
process was automated with Risk & Needs tests. These tests include the
Driver Risk Inventory-II, SAQ-Adult Probation III, Domestic Violence Inventory
and the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This research is reported in Edward C.
Birkel and David L. Wegner's article (2000). "Accurate Intensive Supervision
Probation Selection: Revisited." American Probation and Parole Association,
Perspectives, Vol. 24, #4 Fall, pp. 18-21. To read this article click on the Perspectives Research Article link.
Fairness goes
beyond reliability and validity. The term applies to test accuracy for
demographic groups like age, gender and ethnicity. Version II scale scoring
equations are adjusted, as warranted, on an annual basis to insure fairness.
Staff Member Input:
The ACDI-Corrections Version II is to be used in conjunction with experienced
staff judgment. When available, juvenile court and adjustment records should be
reviewed, as they can contain important information not provided or incorrectly
provided by the juvenile. Experienced staff should also interview the client.
For these reasons, the following statement is contained on each Version II
report: "ACDI - Corrections Version II results are confidential and
should be considered working hypotheses. No decision should be based solely
upon these results. The ACDI - Corrections Version II is
to be used in conjunction with experienced staff judgment." Space is
also provided in ACDI-Corrections Version II reports for staff input.
UNIQUE
FEATURES
The Truthfulness Scale
measures how truthful and open the juvenile was while completing the
ACDI-Corrections Version II. This scale identifies denial, problem minimization
and faking. Many troubled youths attempt to minimize their problems. A
Truthfulness Scale is a necessary component in contemporary juvenile
assessment. The ACDI-Corrections Version II Truthfulness Scale has been
validated with other tests, truthfulness studies and the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (MMPI) L and F-Scales. It consists of a number of items
that most juveniles agree or disagree with. This important scale has been
demonstrated to be reliable, valid and accurate. Much of this normative
research is reported in the document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific
Findings."
Truth-Corrected Scores have proven to be very important in enhancing
assessment accuracy. This proprietary truth correction program is comparable to
the MMPI K-Scale correction methodology. The ACDI-Corrections Version II
Truthfulness Scale has been correlated with the other six Version II scales.
The Truth Correction equation then converts raw scores to Truth-Corrected
scores. Truth Correction scores are more accurate than raw scores. Raw scores
reflect what the juvenile wants you to know. Truth-Corrected scores reveal what
the juvenile is trying to hide.
"Includes a
Violence (Lethality) Scale"
The Violence (Lethality) Scale measures the juvenile’s propensity
for using force to injure, damage or destroy. It identifies the youth’s danger
to self and others. The burgeoning awareness of adolescent violence (lethality)
in our society resulted in the inclusion of the Violence Scale in the
ACDI-Corrections Version II. When screening violence or lethality potential is
important, we recommend you use the ACDI-Corrections Version II.
The Distress Scale
measures the youth’s experienced pain, suffering, anxiety and depression. The
blending of symptom clusters is clear in the definition of dysphoria, i.e., a
generalized feeling of anxiety, restlessness and depression. Distress
incorporates unhappiness, dissatisfaction, worry, apprehension, etc. The
Distress Scale also incorporates items symptomatic of anxiety and depression.
Distress has broad applicability in adjustment, intervention, counseling and
outcome.
The Stress Coping
Abilities Scale measures how well the juvenile handles stress,
tension and pressure. This scale goes beyond establishing whether or not a
juvenile is experiencing stress. It determines how well the youth handles or
copes with stress. How well a person handles stress can effect their adjustment
and mental health. Stress exacerbates emotional and mental health
symptomatology. Consequently, this scale is a non-introversive way to screen
established (diagnosable) mental health problems. A juvenile scoring at or
above the 90th percentile on the Stress Coping Abilities Scale
should be referred for a more comprehensive evaluation and diagnosis, as
warranted. This important area of inquiry is missed by most other juvenile
screening instruments.
More than just another
alcohol or drug test: In addition to alcohol and drugs, the
ACDI-Corrections Version II assesses other important areas of inquiry like
truthfulness, violence (lethality), distress, adjustment and stress coping
abilities. The ACDI-Corrections Version II is designed specifically for
juvenile (male and female) assessment. It provides the information needed for
understanding juvenile attitudes and behavior.
Three ways to give Version II:
The ACDI-Corrections Version II can be administered in three different ways:
1. Paper-Pencil test booklet format is the most popular testing
procedure. English and Spanish test booklets are available.
2. Version II tests can be given directly on the computer screen.
Some youth offender programs dedicate computers for on-screen testing.
3. Human voice audio is available for English and Spanish speaking
youths. This involves a computer and a headset. The juvenile uses the up-down
arrow keys. As the juvenile goes from question to answer with the arrow keys,
that question or answer is highlighted on the monitor (screen) and
simultaneously read to the juvenile. These three administration modes are
discussed in the ACDI Orientation and Training Manual. Each test administration
mode has advantages and some limitations. Risk & Needs offers these three
test administration modes so test users can select the administration mode that
is optimally suited to their needs.
"Demonstrated
Reliability, Validity and Accuracy"
Reading Impaired Assessment: Reading impaired juveniles represent
20+ percent of youth tested. This represents a serious problem to many other
juvenile tests. In contrast, Risk & Needs has developed a proprietary
alternative for reading impaired assessment which is termed "human voice
audio."
Human Voice Audio (in English or Spanish) helps resolve many reading
problems along with cultural difference issues. Passive vocabularies are often
greater than active vocabularies. Hearing items read often helps reduce both
cultural and communication problems. As discussed earlier, "human voice audio"
test presentation requires a computer, earphones and simple instructions
regarding how to operate the up-down arrow keys located on the computer
keyboard. Without this "human voice" option, a juvenile screening program could
be limited.
Confidentiality: Risk & Needs encourages test users to delete
juvenile names from diskettes before they are returned to Risk & Needs.
This proprietary name deletion procedure involves a few keystrokes. Once
juvenile names are deleted, they are gone and cannot be retrieved. Deleting
juvenile names does not delete demographics or test data, which is downloaded
into the ACDI-Corrections Version II database for subsequent analysis. This
procedure insures juvenile confidentiality and
compliance with HIPAA (federal regulation 45 C.F.R. 164.501).
Test Data Input Verification: This proprietary program allows the
person that inputs the test data from the answer sheet into the computer to
verify the accuracy of their data input. In brief, test data is input twice,
and any inconsistencies between the first and second data entries are
highlighted until corrected. When the first and second data entries match or
are the same, the staff person may continue. Use of this data entry
verification procedure is optional, yet it is strongly recommended by Risk
& Needs.
Inventory of Scientific Findings: Much of the ACDI-Corrections
Version II research has been gathered together in one document titled "ACDI: An
Inventory of Scientific Findings." This document summarizes Version II research
chronologically -- as the studies were completed.
This rather innovative chronological reporting
format was established largely because of the Version II database, which
permits annual database analysis of all tests administered. It also allows the
reader to observe the evolution of the ACDI-Corrections Version II into its
current state-of-the-art position.
To review an ACDI-Corrections Version II Research
Study, click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Research
Study link. This research study link is also provided at the end of
this webpage.
Orientation and
Training Manual: The ACDI-Corrections Version II Orientation and
Training Manual (O&T Manual) explains how Version II works. This manual is
a must read for staff that will be using Version II. O&T Manual content
includes, but is not limited to, the following: testing instructions,
explanation of how scores are derived, interpretation of how court and
corrections information is used in the scoring methodology, description of
unique Version II features and much much more.
Computer Operating
Guide: Some computer operators want more information than others.
Consequently, Risk & Needs provides a One-Page Quick Start, which includes
basic instructions for scoring and a more comprehensive Computer Operating
Guide. The Computer Operating Guide contains instructions for using MS-DOS as
well as Windows software. This manual discusses hardware, software, scoring,
printing reports and much more.
Staff Training: Risk & Needs staff is available to participate
in ACDI-Corrections Version II training programs scheduled by test users in the
United States. Large departments, agencies or statewide programs often are
interested in Version II staff training. Sometimes, smaller agencies or
departments get together for a joint training session on the ACDI-Corrections
Version II. This training can include hands-on computer scoring. Risk &
Needs gives attendees certificates attesting to their ACDI-Corrections Version
II training.
Staff training is also provided on Fridays at Risk
& Needs' Phoenix offices from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. or from 1:30 p.m. to
4:30 p.m. These training sessions are free. To participate, contact Risk &
Needs at least ten days in advance. Participation is on a first call, first
scheduled basis.
"Appropriate for
Family and Juvenile Drug Courts"
ACDI-Corrections Version II
Highlights
|
** ACDI-Corrections Version II **
|
-
Designed specifically for juveniles
|
-
Detects denial, minimization & faking
|
-
Comprehensive: 7 scales (measures)
|
-
Violence Scale measures lethality
|
-
Demonstrated reliability & validity
|
-
Available in English & Spanish
|
-
Built-in database insures on going research
|
-
More than just an alcohol or drug test
|
-
Specific score-related recommendations
|
-
Strong accountability of recommendations
|
-
Affordable: volume discounts available
|
-
Thirty-day money back guarantee
|
What users are saying ...
"The Adolescent Chemical Dependency Inventory
(ACDI) format is focused, sequential, and easy to read. The overlay between the
print-out and staff assessment has been a perfect fit. The staff response is
'right-on-target.' The scope of the analysis is broad, but concise. Our tested
population falls into a normal, bell-curve distribution. The diskette allows us
to give a same week guarantee, same day probability, and same hour feedback
appropriate for the identified problems. Finally, the option for telephone
consultation is of significant value if or when needed - which for this office
has been perhaps twice over the past eleven months (in a word or two - its
trouble free!)."
Porter County Juvenile Probation Office, Indiana
"We have been using the Adolescent Chemical
Dependency Inventory (ACDI) in our standardized youth intake evaluations for
two years now. The ACDI has had many positive advantages to our clients, staff
and in terms of our mission, i.e., to provide the highest quality of service to
those in need at affordable prices. The availability of test results within the
same day enables us to focus our interviews and thereby save significant staff
time. Test results are summarized in an easily understood manner regarding our
client’s problems, situation and needs. Client risk levels are summarized at a
glance and recommendations are both relevant and helpful. This objective and
reliable information does provide us with a 'sound basis for decision making.'
The ACDI shortens our intake procedures, aids us in cutting through denial and
facilitates intervention."
National Council on Alcoholism, Inc., Arizona
"As you are aware we successfully piloted the
ACDI-Corrections Version and SAQ-Adult Probation. Staff response was
overwhelmingly positive. Ninety-six percent of survey responses indicated that
SAQ-Adult Probation was a useful screening tool. Similar results were obtained
for the ACDI-Corrections Version."
Department of Solicitor General, Nova Scotia
"The ACDI-Corrections Version II is used to
evaluate youth entering our juvenile probation department. This test has been
used in conjunction with investigations and direct probation and found to be
quite useful in the determination of juvenile risk/needs. The profile it
provides is user friendly and demonstratively reliable and valid."
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Administrative Office of the Courts/Probation
"I am writing to indicate how pleased we are with
the ACDI. This screening instrument provides us with an enormous amount of
invaluable information at a fraction of the cost of any alternatives. As you
know, we provide troubled youth with a strenuous eight day program in the
Northern Flinders Ranges and a reliable initial screening program for
prospective participants is essential . . . Over time the ACDI will allow us to
develop a much better psychological profile of the youth who experience
Operation Flinders."
Operation Flinders, National Curriculum &
Training, Australia
"Based on my experience in psychometric research,
I can assure users of the ACDI-Corrections Version II that this questionnaire
exceeds professional standards for test reliability and validity. It is a
psychometrically sound and useful juvenile assessment instrument."
Doctorate Level Experimental Psychologist, Arizona
"Accurate ISP offender selection has been achieved
by combining the strengths of Nebraska Probation Departments existing risk and
needs worksheet with selected criminal court history and an automated
assessment instrument or test. One of the four tests used in this study was the
ACDI-Corrections Version II. It was shown to accurately predict substance
abuse, identify distress and adjustment problems and measure stress coping
problems . . . These results strongly support the reliability, validity and
accuracy of the ACDI-Corrections Version II."
Perspectives, Volume 24, #4, Fall 2000
"I received the ACDI summary report as requested
earlier this month, and wanted to thank you for not only your prompt response
but also the information the report itself contains.
It is very difficult for small court systems, like
ours, to have the means to compile statistical data on issues other than those
which are legislatively mandated. So many times, needed data, such as which
your summary covered, is unavailable due to the inability of the system to have
the financial resources or technical knowledge base needed. The summary report
gives me the ability to now approach community leaders with hard data
confirming demographic trends and treatment needs that I am aware of but could
not substantiate. Now, future treatment planning that would have not occurred
because of lack of data will occur.
Again, thank you for making the summary report
available as part of the cost of the instrument itself. We, at TASC, will
continue to use the assessment instruments developed by your company and will
also continue to recommend them for use in future Ohio Juvenile TASC programs."
TASC, Common Pleas Court, Ohio
|
"State-of-the-Art Juvenile Assessment"
Juvenile
Violence Interview (JVI):
Is a "structured interview"
that consists of 60 multiple choice items. Each item has four answers. The
answer selected for each item is printed in the JVI report. The JVI is
available to Risk & Needs juvenile test users free. The JVI augments Risk
& Needs juvenile tests and helps develop a violence profile. The JVI is
not
a test and is
not
to be used as a standalone assessment procedure or test. It takes 15 minutes to
complete the JVI. For more information on the Juvenile Violence Interview click
on the JVI link.
Test Unit Fee
(Cost): ACDI-Corrections
Version II cost information can be reviewed by clicking on the Test Unit Fee (Cost) link. There is only
the one cost or charge, and that is the test unit fee. Everything else is
included at no additional cost to the test user. This includes test booklets,
answer sheets, training manuals, upgrades, ongoing database research, annual
summary testing reports, staff training, and support services. Do not be misled
by some test publishers' à la carte pricing like separate costs for each test
administration as well as for each of the test-related items listed above.
Instead of asking for the test administration cost, ask for the total cost
involved in using a test. We believe Risk & Needs' one test unit fee is
very affordable.
Free Examination Kit
A 1-test demo diskette is available on a 30-day
cost free basis. Demo diskettes are in MS-DOS format so that all the software
is contained on the diskette. Examination kits contain the demonstration
diskette, test booklets and training materials. Risk & Needs does want the
demonstration diskette and test booklet returned within 30 days. To request a
free examination kit, click on the Free Examination Kit Request link.
How
to Proceed:
To become a Risk & Needs test user, click on the Agreement & Proposals link,
click on the
Print Client User Agreement
button and fax the completed form to (602) 266-8227,
or mail your completed form to Risk & Needs. Upon its receipt by Risk &
Needs, you become a Risk & Needs test user and can order tests. Established
or Risk & Needs test users can reorder tests by mail, telephone, fax or
e-mail.
Other related links are listed for reference.
They are available as needed.
Test Unit Fee (Cost) webpage link.
Explains Risk & Needs' Test Unit Fees or Costs.
New Client Orders webpage link. Explains
steps to become a "new Risk & Needs client."
How to Order webpage link. Explains how
Risk & Needs tests can be ordered.
Additional information can be provided upon
request. Contact Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix,
Arizona 85064-4828. Risk & Needs' telephone number is
(602) 234-3506, our fax
number is
(602) 266-8227 and our
e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com.
Other Risk & Needs
Tests
Risk & Needs has developed different tests
for different offender populations and different assessment purposes. Adult and
juvenile tests are available. The Tests Functionally Grouped link
on the left side of this webpage includes most Risk & Needs tests.
Similarly, the Tests Alphabetically Listed webpage
contains most of Risk & Needs' tests.
Selecting a juvenile screening instrument or test
If you are selecting a juvenile assessment
instrument, the following Comparison Checklist should prove helpful. This
checklist itemizes important assessment and screening qualities. The "Other"
column represents any other test you might want to compare to the
ACDI-Corrections Version II.
TEST COMPARISON CHECKLIST
|
COMPARISON CATEGORIES
|
ACDI-CV II
|
Other
|
Designed Specifically for Juvenile
Assessment
|
Yes
|
|
Test Reliability & Validity Research Provided
|
Yes
|
|
Test Completed in 30 Minutes
|
Yes
|
|
On-Site Reports within 3 Minutes
|
Yes
|
|
Truthfulness Scale to Detect Faking
|
Yes
|
|
Truth-Corrected Scores for Accuracy
|
Yes
|
|
Three Test Administration Options
|
Yes
|
|
1. Paper-Pencil (English and
Spanish)
|
Yes
|
|
2. On
Computer Screen (English and Spanish)
|
Yes
|
|
3. Human Voice Audio
(English and Spanish)
|
Yes
|
|
Delete Juveniles Names
(confidentiality) Procedure
|
Yes
|
|
HIPAA (federal regulation) Compliant
|
Yes |
|
Test Data Input Verification
(accurate scoring)
|
Yes
|
|
Available in English and Spanish
|
Yes
|
|
Built-in Database
|
Yes
|
|
Annual Database Research (Free)
|
Yes
|
|
Annual Test Program Summary (Free)
|
Yes
|
|
Comprehensive Assessment (Seven Scales)
|
Yes
|
|
Specific Scale Score-Related
Recommendations
|
Yes
|
|
Alcohol and Drugs Scales
|
Yes
|
|
Violence (Lethality) Scale
|
Yes
|
|
Distress Scale
|
Yes
|
|
Adjustment Scale
|
Yes
|
|
Stress Coping Abilities Scale
|
Yes
|
|
Large (50,000+) Research Database
|
Yes
|
|
Available in MS-DOS and Windows
|
Yes
|
|
Easily Understood and Helpful Reports
|
Yes
|
|
ASAM Compatible Recommendations |
Yes |
|
Staff
Training (Free) |
Yes |
|
Examination Kits
(Free) |
Yes |
|
Juvenile
Violence Interview (Free) |
Yes |
|
Thirty-Day Money Back
Guarantee |
Yes |
|
Very
Affordable Test Unit Fee |
Yes |
|
ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II
SCALE INTERPRETATION
An example ACDI-Corrections Version II report
follows this discussion of scale interpretation. It is provided as a ready
reference to augment this dialogue. There are several levels of
ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) interpretation ranging from viewing
Version II as a self-report to interpreting scale elevations and
interrelationships. The following table is a beginning point for interpreting
Version II scores.
ACDI-Corrections Version
II Scale Ranges
|
Risk Category
|
Risk Range
Percentile |
Total
Percentage |
Low Risk |
0 - 39% |
39% |
Medium Risk |
40 - 69% |
30% |
Problem Risk |
70 - 89% |
20% |
Severe Problem |
90 - 100% |
11% |
With reference to the above table, a problem is
not identified until a scale score is at the 70th percentile or higher.
Elevated scale
scores refer to percentile scores that are at or above the 70th percentile.
Severe (serious) problems
are identified by scale scores at or above the 90th percentile. Severe problems
represent the highest 11 percent of juveniles evaluated with Version II.
Version II has been normed on over 50,000 troubled youths. And, this normative
sample continues to expand with each Version II test that is administered.
SCALE INTERPRETATION
1.
Truthfulness Scale: Measures
how truthful the juvenile was while completing the test. It identifies guarded
and defensive youths who attempt to fake good. Scores at or below the 89th
percentile mean that all ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) scales are
accurate. Scores in the 70th to 89th percentile are accurate because they have
been Truth-Corrected. Truthfulness Scale scores at or above the 90th percentile
mean that all Version II scales are inaccurate (invalid) because the juvenile
was overly guarded and manifesting denial, read things into Version II test
items that aren’t there, was minimizing problems, or was caught faking answers.
Youths with a reading impairment might also invalidate their tests with
Truthfulness Scale scores in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile)
range. The reason for invalidation can usually be determined with a few
questions regarding the juvenile’s schooling, reading ability and motivation.
If not consciously deceptive, youths with elevated Truthfulness Scale scores
are uncooperative, fail to understand test items or have a need to appear in a
good light.
Truthfulness
Scale scores at or below the 89th percentile indicate that all other scale
scores are accurate. When
reviewing a Version II report, one of the first things to check is the
Truthfulness Scale score. A Truthfulness Scale score at or above the 90th
percentile does not occur by chance.
2.
Violence (Lethality) Scale:
Measures the juvenile’s propensity for using force to injure, damage or
destroy. This scale identifies youths that are a danger to themselves and
others. Violence is operationally defined as the expression of hostility and
rage through physical force. Violence is aggression in its most extreme and
unacceptable form. Elevated scorers are demanding, overly sensitive to
perceived criticism and insightless about how they express their
anger/hostility. They often have poor school records and feel emotionally
isolated.
Severe problem scorers are typically erratic,
angry, easily provoked and dangerous. A particularly unstable and perilous
situation exists when the youth manifests an elevated Violence Scale score in
conjunction with an elevated Alcohol Scale and/or Drugs Scale score. Here, we
have increased probability of acting out behaviors combined with impaired
judgment.
In combination with an elevated Violence Scale,
an elevated Distress Scale score increases the probability of suicidal
ideation. Elevated Adjustment Scale and/or Stress Coping Abilities Scale scores
in conjunction with an elevated Violence Scale score provide insight regarding
co-determinants and possible treatment alternatives.
The more of these scales that are elevated with the Violence Scale, the worse
the prognosis. Elevated
scale interrelationships are important when interpreting scale elevations. Any
scale scores in the Severe Problem range should not be ignored, and this is
especially true of the Violence Scale. The Violence Scale score can be
interpreted independently or in combination with other Version II scales.
3.
Alcohol Scale: Measures
alcohol use and/or abuse. "Alcohol" refers to beer, wine and other liquors. An
elevated (70th to 89th percentile) Alcohol Scale is indicative of an emerging
drinking problem. An Alcohol Scale score in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th
percentile) range identifies serious alcohol-related problems.
A history of alcohol-related arrests could result
in an Alcohol Scale score in the Low or Medium Risk range. To determine if the
juvenile is a "recovering" alcoholic, Version II users should check items #57
(admission to drinking problem), #131 (self-description of drinking)
and #133 (the "recovery" question).
For reference, other items also could be checked (e.g., #15, 21, 33, 39, 51,
96, 132). Admissions to these items are printed on page 3 of the Version II
report.
In conjunction with an elevated Alcohol Scale, an
elevated Violence Scale represents a dangerous combination, e.g., a violent
predisposition with impaired judgment. When both the Alcohol and Drugs Scales
are elevated, the highest score usually represents the juvenile’s substance of
choice. When both are in the Severe Problem range, explore polysubstance abuse.
An elevated Distress Scale with an elevated Alcohol Scale could reflect
emerging suicidal ideation or a frustration - aggressive explosive acting out.
A higher Alcohol Scale score may be a focal issue; whereas, a higher Distress
Scale might be indicative of a troubled youth’s attempt to "self-medicate." An
elevated Adjustment Scale in combination with an elevated Alcohol Scale helps
identify co-determinants. The amplitude of an elevated Stress Coping Abilities
Scale score and an elevated Alcohol Scale score are important. An elevated
(70th to 89th percentile) Stress Coping Abilities Scale score reflects impaired
stress handling abilities, and drinking may be of an "escape-avoidance" nature;
whereas, a score in the Severe Problem range suggests the presence of an
identifiable (diagnosable) mental health disorder. In the latter case drinking
may be part of the psychopathology. In summary, the Alcohol Scale can be
interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version
II scales.
4.
Drugs Scale:
Measures illicit drug use and abuse. The Drugs
Scale measures the severity of drug abuse. "Drugs" refers to marijuana, crack,
cocaine, ice, LSD, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. This scale is
independent of the Alcohol Scale described above. An elevated (70th to 89th
percentile) Drugs Scale score is indicative of an emerging drug problem.
Elevated Drugs Scale scores do not happen by chance. A Drugs Scale score in the
Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range identifies severe drug-related
problems.
A history of drug arrests could result in a Drugs
Scale score in the low or moderate risk range. To determine if the juvenile is
a "recovering" drug abuser, Version II users should check items #29 (drug use
admission), #78 (drug abuse problem) and
#133 (the "recovery" question).
For reference, other items could also be checked (e.g., #23, 85, 53, 91).
Admissions to these items are printed on page 3 of the Version II report.
In intervention and treatment settings, the
youth’s Drugs Scale score helps work through denial.
And, an elevated Drugs Scale
score in conjunction with other elevated Version II scores magnifies the
severity of the other elevated scores.
For example, an elevated Violence Scale in conjunction with an elevated Drugs
Scale score identifies a very dangerous person.
When both the Drugs and Alcohol Scales are
elevated, the higher score represents the youth’s substance of choice. When
both of these scores are in the Severe Problem range, polysubstance abuse is
indicated.
An elevated Distress Scale in combination with an
elevated Drugs Scale reflects a troubled youth on the verge of being
overwhelmed. The height of the Distress Scale is important as scores in the
Severe Problem range can be indicative of suicidal/homicidal ideation. As noted
earlier with alcohol, an elevated Adjustment Scale in combination with an
elevated Drugs Scale helps identify co-determinants. And, the height of an
elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale and an elevated Drugs Scale score are
important. An elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score reflects impaired
stress coping abilities and drug use may be experimental; whereas, a score in
the Severe Problem range points to an identifiable (diagnosable) mental health
disorder. In this case (Severe Problem), drug use/abuse is likely a part of the
symptomatology. In summary, the Drugs Scale can be interpreted independently or
in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales. In most cases, a
drug problem (elevated scale score) magnifies the risk associated with other
elevated Version II scale scores.
5.
Distress Scale: Measures
the youth’s pain, suffering, anxiety and depression. Distress incorporates
unhappiness, dissatisfaction, worry and pain. Distress is the most common
reason for juveniles to voluntarily seek counseling. Distress has broad
applications in adjustment, intervention, counseling and outcome. And, it often
serves as the beginning point in clinical inquiry.
The magnitude (or severity) of the Distress Scale is important.
Elevated scores indicate some-thing is wrong. The youth is concerned, bothered
and upset. Distress Scale scores in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th
percentile) range indicate the youth is hurting, on the verge of being
overwhelmed and is becoming desperate.
A Severe Problem Distress Scale in conjunction
with any other Version II scale in the Severe Problem range is a malignant sign
and needs to be dealt with carefully. This is the profile of a
suicidal/homicidal prone individual. The Distress Scale can be interpreted
independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.
6.
Adjustment Scale: Measures
the youth’s ability to adapt, conform and function. This scale recognizes
personal and social stressors at home, school and in one’s peer group
relationships. Juvenile adjustment requires modification of the youth’s
attitudes and behavior. Stressors vary widely from the home and school
environment (along with anxiety, frustration and competition) to a myriad of
emotion provoking events. When
the Adjustment Scale is elevated, carefully review other Version II scales.
Other Version II scales include
Violence, Substance Abuse, Distress and Stress Coping Abilities.
An elevated Adjustment Scale suggests one level
of intervention (e.g., lifestyle adjustment); whereas, a score in the Severe
Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range suggests other more fundamental
intervention options. An elevated Distress Scale score with an elevated
Adjustment Scale score is suggestive of poor emotional morale in a problem
prone environmental milieu, e.g., school, home and/or peer group. An elevated
Adjustment Scale in combination with an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale
reflects a troubled youth who doesn’t cope well with his environment. In this
case, the youth might benefit most from stress management training, emotional
support of endeavor and lifestyle adjustment. The Adjustment Scale can be
interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version
II scales.
7.
Stress Coping Abilities Scale:
Measures the youth’s ability to cope with stress, anxiety and pressure. It is
now accepted that stress exacerbates symptoms of mental and emotional problems.
Thus, an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score in conjunction with other
elevated Version II scales helps explain the youth’s situation. When a juvenile
doesn’t handle stress well, other existing problems are often exacerbated.
Such problem augmentation applies to substance abuse, behavioral acting-out and
attitudinal problems. And, an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score can
also exacerbate emotional and mental health symptomatology.
When a Stress Coping Abilities Scale
score is in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range, it is very
likely that the juvenile has a diagnosable mental health problem.
In these instances, referral to a certified/licensed mental health professional
is warranted for a diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan. The Stress Coping
Abilities Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other
ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.
* * * * *
In conclusion, it was noted that there are
several "levels" of ACDI-Corrections Version II interpretation ranging from
viewing Version II as a self-report to interpreting scale elevations and
interrelationships. Scale scores can be interpreted individually. Staff can
then put Version II findings within the context of the juvenile’s life
situation.
For More Information
Additional ACDI-Corrections Version II information can be provided upon request
by contacting Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix,
Arizona 85064-4828. Our telephone number is
(602) 234-3506, our fax
number is (602) 266-8227,
and our e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com.
Example Report
An example ACDI-Corrections Version II report has been included
for reference. Although "Example Report" is a hypothetical person, this
four-page report shows how information is summarized and presented. These
reports are easy to read and provide specific scale-related recommendations. On
the first page, the ACDI-Corrections Version II PROFILE summarizes the youth’s
responses at a glance. Scale paragraphs, on pages 2 and 3, give the juvenile's
scale score, explain what that score means and present score-related
recommendations. Near the bottom of page 3 is space for the assessor's
observations and comments. Sometimes, a staff member obtains important
information from another source (e.g., victim, court history, other records,
etc.) that influences their recommendation. That’s OK. That’s why space is
provided for staff member comments.
Page 4 summarizes significant items. These are direct admissions
or unusual responses. Significant items often give considerable focus and
insight to the assessment process. Towards the bottom of page 4 are the
Multiple Choice answers, with all of the youth’s opinions and biases. This
sequence of items (#131 to #140) are multiple choice items, and the juvenile's
selected answers are shown. Sometimes, it’s helpful to compare the youth's
objective, empirically established scores with their subjective
answers. Multiple Choice items are not Truth-Corrected.
EXAMPLE REPORT
ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II
The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) example report is
presented for your review. Each Version II report is organized around the same
outline or format, yet these reports are highly individualized. Each
report is 4 pages in length. And, all Version II reports are scored and printed
within 2½ minutes from data entry.
The
first page
of the Version II report begins with the juvenile's name and some demographics,
e.g., age, gender, ethnicity and education. The ACDI-Corrections Version II
Profile (graph) summarizes Version II scores at glance. The first page
concludes with the juvenile's reported court history.
ACDI - CORRECTIONS VERSION II
*****************************
CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
*****************************
NAME :
Example Report
ID # :
00000000000
AGE: 16 SEX : Male
ETHNICITY/RACE : Caucasian
EDUCATION/GRADE : 10th Grade
DATE ACDI SCORED : 12/11/2004
ACDI - Corrections Version II results are confidential and should
be
considered working hypotheses. No decision should be based solely upon
these results. The ACDI - Corrections Version II is to
be used in
conjunction with experienced staff judgment.
MEASURES
%ile
ACDI-CV II PROFILE
--------
----
+---------------+-----------+-------+---+
- LOW RISK - MEDIUM
-PROBLEM-MAX-
-
-
- - -
TRUTHFULNESS
55
***********************.....-.......-...-
-
-
- - -
ALCOHOL
90
*************************************...-
-
-
- - -
DRUGS
87
***********************************.-...-
-
-
- - -
VIOLENCE
83
**********************************..-...-
-
-
- - -
DISTRESS
86
***********************************.-...-
-
-
- - -
ADJUSTMENT
70
*****************************.......-...-
-
-
- - -
STRESS COPING
77
*******************************.....-...-
+---------------+-----------+-------+---+
0
40
70 90 100
----------- PERCENTILE SCORES -----------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT
-----------------------------------------
Age at First Arrest.......... 15 Times in Juvenile Detention......
1
Times on Probation........... 1 Juvenile Court
Hearings.......... 1
Probation Revocations........ 0 Alcohol-Related
Arrests.......... 1
Total Number of Arrests...... 1 Drug-Related
Arrests............. 1
Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
ACDI-Corrections Version II Copyright (c) 1998. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
|
The
second page of the Version
II report presents a summary paragraph for four of Version II's scales
(measures): Truthfulness Scale, Alcohol Scale, Drugs Scale, and Violence Scale.
Each paragraph presents the youth's scale score, explains what that score means
and offers specific score-related recommendations.
NAME: Example
Report
-2-
ACDI-CV II REPORT
* * SUMMARY PARAGRAPHS EXPLAINING CLIENT'S ATTAINED SCALE SCORES * *
------------------------------------------------------------
TRUTHFULNESS SCALE: MEDIUM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:55
This youth's response pattern on the Truthfulness
Scale is in the
Medium Risk (40 to 69th percentile) range.
The ACDI-Corrections
Version II profile is accurate. However, there is a tendency for this
youth to deny common problems and to
portray self in an overly
favorable light. Specific questions will usually
be answered more
accurately than open-ended or general type questions. The Truthfulness
Scale is accurate and other ACDI-Corrections Version II scale
scores
are accurate. This individual has adequate reading skills and appears
to have answered test items reasonably accurately.
ALCOHOL SCALE: MAXIMUM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:90
This juvenile's score on the Alcohol Scale is in
the High Risk or
Severe Problem (90 to 100th percentile) range. Either
this indivi-
dual's use of alcohol (beer, wine or liquor) is out of
control or
this juvenile is a recovering (alcohol problem, but has stopped drink-
ing) alcoholic. Serious alcohol abuse is indicated and
many self-
report indicators of alcohol abuse are evident. This juvenile has
an
alcohol-related problem. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Annual re-evaluation
throughout probation is recommended. Options include: substance
(al-
cohol) abuse outpatient counseling, chemical dependency
treatment,
intensive outpatient counseling services. If recovering, this juvenile
should continue in treatment, counseling
or 12-step community
program involvement. Relapse risk is high. Family counseling should be
encouraged.
DRUGS SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:87
This juvenile's response pattern on the Drugs Scale is in the Problem
Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range. Either drug use is not controlled
or this person is recovering (drug problem, but has stopped
using).
Drug (marijuana, cocaine, LSD, heroin, etc.) abuse is indicated. Drug
use or abuse is likely a focal issue in this juvenile's
adjustment
problems. An established pattern of drug abuse is indicated.
Annual
re-evaluation is desirable. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Moderately intensive
probation including personal reporting and
participation in drug-
related counseling (individual or group) or 12-step community program
involvement should be considered. If recovering, this juvenile should
continue in treatment, counseling or Young People in NA.
Relapse is
possible. Family counseling could be helpful. A
firm probationary
structure combined with monitored counseling attendance and compliance
is desirable.
VIOLENCE SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:83
This juvenile's response pattern on the Violence Scale
is in the
Problem Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range. When frustrated or angered
this youth can all to easily become agitated, uncontrolled, threaten-
ing or even combative. Whether boisterous, distraught or
disorderly,
this client's behavior has an unpredictable ugly or violent
quality.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Participation in a group counseling program designed
to resolve anger/violent behavior is recommended. Regular
probation
incorporating personal reporting is appropriate.
Review the other
ACDI-Corrections Version II scales to assess the range of contributing
stressors and areas of conflict or concern. This is a
problem risk
|
The
third page completes the
scale paragraphs for the Distress Scale, Adjustment Scale and the Stress Coping
Abilities Scale. Page 3 concludes with a reproduction of all Version II
answers.
NAME: Example
Report
-3-
ACDI-CV II REPORT
profile. This troubled youth needs help.
DISTRESS SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:86
This juvenile's score on the Distress Scale is in the Problem Risk (70
to 89th percentile) range. Distress incorporates both
anxiety and
depression and represents the most common reason for seeking counsel-
ing. Symptoms include uneasiness, apprehension, unhappiness and vary-
ing degrees of anger, guilt or shame. Distress is contributing to this
person's emotional and adjustment problems. This juvenile is distress-
ed or disturbed and needs help. RECOMMENDATIONS: This is a
troubled
youth that should talk to somebody about existing problems
and con-
cerns. Counseling (individual, family or group) is recommended.
With
regard to distress, moderately intensive probation including partici-
pation in counseling (as warranted) is recommended.
ADJUSTMENT SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:70
This juvenile's response pattern on the Adjustment
Scale is in the
Problem Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range. Many indicators
of dis-
satisfaction and maladjustment (e.g., acting-out, runaway, poor grades
or drop-out, substance abuse, delinquency, etc.) are evident. This is
a troubled youth with authority problems and
concerns. Supportive
counseling and clarification of personal, academic
and vocational
goals would help. This juvenile is likely described as
ineffective
and/or unconcerned. This troubled youth needs help.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Medium-intensity probation, and counseling (family or group) should be
considered. A decision regarding suitable residential placement may be
needed. This juvenile functions best in consistently structured
set-
tings characterized by clearly established expectations and consistent
consequences.
STRESS COPING SCALE: PROBLEM RISK
RANGE
RISK PERCENTILE:77
High levels of experienced stress and/or below average stress
coping
abilities are indicated. Stress can exacerbate
other symptoms and
contribute to adjustment difficulties. This person manifests impaired
stress coping abilities. This person's score on the
Stress Coping
Abilities Scale is in the Problem Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range.
* * * * *
ACDI-CV II RESPONSES
--------------------
1- 50 TTTTTTTTTT FTTFFTTTTT TFTTTTFFTT FFTFFTTFFT
FTFTTFTTTF
51-100 FTTFFTTFFT TTFTTFFTTT FTTFFTTFFT TFFTTFFTTF
FTTFFTFTFT
101-140 2323213222 2212221221 3221222223 4444444444
Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
ACDI-Corrections Version II Copyright (c) 1998. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
The fourth
page contains significant
items (direct admissions and unusual answers) to the Alcohol Scale, Drugs
Scale, Violence (Lethality) Scale, Distress Scale and the Adjustment Scale.
Significant items are followed by the Multiple Choice items, (items #131-140),
which consists of 10 multiple choice questions. Each of these items has four
possible answers, and the answer selected by the juvenile is printed in the
report. This helps the assessor determine the juvenile's answers to items of
interest to the staff member. Page 4 concludes with space provided for staff
member observations and comments, staff member signature and
date.
NAME: Example
Report
-4-
ACDI-CV II REPORT
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS: These answers are the youth's
responses. They
represent direct admissions or unusual answers which when explored in
interview often help in understanding the juvenile's
motivation.
ALCOHOL
DRUGS
-------
-----
21. Drinking becoming a problem 5. Has used drugs
excessively
33. Drinking problem in last year 17. Many close friends use drugs
45. Family and social problems 23. At times
worries about drug use
57. Admits to a drinking problem 29. Uses and sometimes
abuses drugs
89. Attended AA meetings for help 47. Used before school or at
lunch
53. Attended NA or CA meetings
85. Had counseling for drug use
VIOLENCE
DISTRESS
--------
--------
6. Short temper and angers quickly 8. Unhappy with life
30. So angry can't control self 20. Frequently
discouraged
36. More dangerous than age peers 26. Feels alone and unhappy
48. Violent temper
tantrums 44. Last year: unhappy
& depressed
60. Admits a gang
member 62.
States unhappy & needs help
65. States a violent
person 69. Thinks about death
& suicide
81. Wants to talk with a counselor
ADJUSTMENT
----------
4. More unhappy than age peers
16. "Turned off" in school
70. Unhappy at home
MULTIPLE CHOICE: These answers reflect the youth's opinions with
all their biases, defensiveness and minimization. Sometimes comparison
of a youth's subjective answers with their objective scale scores
facilitates insight and client understanding.
131. Drinking is not a problem 136. Drug use no problem
132. No need for alcohol treatment 137. No need for drug treatment
133. Not a recovering person 138. Rates
9-10 (severe distress)
134. Never been a gang member 139. Not suicidal
or homicidal
135. Denies any family problems 140. No need to see a
counselor
* * * * *
OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS______________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________
______________
STAFF MEMBER
SIGNATURE
DATE (TEST #
1 )
|
We hope this ACDI-Corrections Version II webpage has been interesting and
helpful. Additional information can be provided upon request by writing Risk
& Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, Arizona 85064-4828. Our
telephone number is (602)
234-3506, our fax number is
(602) 266-8227
and our e-mail address is
hhl@riskandneeds.com.
|