ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II

 


ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II
Designed for Juvenile (Male & Female) Assessment

 

The ACDI-Corrections Version II is a comprehensive juvenile (male and female) assessment or screening test. It is used in juvenile courts (drug courts, family courts, municipal courts, etc.), probation departments, community corrections and treatment programs. If the intent is to identify disturbed and/or violent juveniles so they can be helped, you should consider the ACDI-Corrections Version II. It is appropriate for misdemeanor and felony cases. The ACDI-Corrections Version II has impressively demonstrated reliability, validity and accuracy.

Applications

** ACDI-Corrections Version II **

  • Juvenile courts
     
  • Family and juvenile drug courts
     
  • Juvenile (male and female) probation departments
     
  • Juvenile assessment, counseling and treatment agencies
     
  • Juvenile community corrections

Description

The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) is an automated (computer-scored) juvenile assessment instrument or test. It consists of 140 items and takes 25 to 30 minutes to complete. Version II contains seven measures (scales): 1. Truthfulness Scale, 2. Alcohol Scale, 3. Drugs Scale, 4. Violence (Lethality) Scale, 5. Distress Scale, 6. Adjustment Scale and 7. Stress Coping Abilities Scale.

Seven Scales (Measures)

The seven ACDI-Corrections Version II scales are described as follows:

  1. Truthfulness Scale: Measures the juvenile’s truthfulness while completing the test. It identifies denial, guardedness, problem minimization and faking. The Truthfulness Scale detects faking good.
     

  2. Alcohol Scale: Measures alcohol use, the severity of abuse and the presence of alcohol-related problems. "Alcohol" refers to beer, wine and other liquors.
     

  3. Drugs Scale: Measures illicit drug use and the severity of abuse. "Drugs" refers to marijuana (pot), crack, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. This scale is independent of the Alcohol Scale described above.
     

  4. Violence (Lethality) Scale: Measures the use of force to injure, damage or destroy. This scale identifies the youth’s danger to self and others.
     

  5. Distress Scale: Measures strain imposed by pain, worry, anxiety, depression, physical torment or suffering. Distress is the most common reason for juveniles to seek counseling.
     

  6. Adjustment Scale: Measures the youth’s ability to adapt, conform and function. This scale recognizes personal and social stressors at home, at school and in authority relationships. It incorporates personal and social forces involved in adapting to one’s environment.
     

  7. Stress Coping Abilities Scale: Measures the youth’s ability to cope with stress, anxiety and pressure. Stress exacerbates symptoms of emotional and mental health problems. This scale is a non-introversive way to screen for the presence of established emotional and mental health problems.

ACDI: THE SHORTER 5 SCALE VERSION

As noted earlier, the ACDI-Corrections Version II, or Version II, has 7 measures (scales), consists of 140 items, has a Violence (Lethality) Scale and takes 30 minutes to complete. The Adolescent Chemical Dependency Inventory, or ACDI, is a shorter version (105 items), does not have the Violence (Lethality) Scale and takes 15 to 20 minutes to complete. The ACDI has 5 scales (measures): 1. Truthfulness Scale, 2. Adjustment Scale, 3. Distress Scale, 4. Alcohol Scale, 5. Drugs Scale. To go directly to the ACDI web page, click on the ACDI link. The choice is yours.

* * * * *

Why use the ACDI-Corrections Version II? While adult crime rates have recently fallen across the U.S., they have risen among the nation's youth. For example, as the adult arrest rate for murder fell from 1978 to 1993, the juvenile murder rate rose by 77%. And, at the same time, the arrest rate of youth for all violent crimes climbed 79%. These statistics underscore the need for meaningful and accurate juvenile assessment. Early detection of troubled youths' problems facilitates quicker intervention and treatment. This type of information also helps in deciding upon counseling, treatment, probation, levels of supervision and incarceration alternatives. The ACDI-Corrections Version II is designed to meet these needs. It is much more than just another alcohol or drug test. Version II’s seven scales (measures) acquire important information often missed by other tests.

"Appropriate for Misdemeanor and Felony Offenders"

At one sitting of approximately 30 minutes in duration, staff can acquire a vast amount of juvenile-related information, which includes attitudes, substance abuse involvement, acting out (violence) propensity, perceived distress and coping behaviors. Early problem identification facilitates timely intervention and improved treatment results.

FOR EASY REFERENCE

The following links provide quick access to some of the unique ACDI-Corrections Version II features that are discussed below.

Reliability & Validity Test Comparison Checklist
Annual Summary Reports Scale Interpretation
Truthfulness Scale Confidentiality
Violence Scale Example Report
Human Voice Audio Research Study
Test Unit Fee
(Cost)
What users are saying

 

Advantages of Screening

Screening or assessment instruments filter out individuals with serious problems that may re-quire referral for a more comprehensive evaluation and/or treatment. This filtering system works as follows:

ACDI-Corrections Version II Risk Ranges

Risk Category

Risk Range
Percentile

Total
Percentage

Low Risk

0 - 39%

39%

Medium Risk

40 - 69%

30%

Problem Risk

70 - 89%

20%

Severe Problem

90 - 100%

11%

Reference to the above Risk Range table shows that a problem is not identified until a scale score is at the 70th percentile or higher. These risk range percentiles are based upon the thousands of troubled youths that have taken the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This procedure is eminently fair, and it avoids extremes, i.e., over-identification and under-identification of problems and risk.

A state, department, juvenile court, family and juvenile drug court or agency policy might refer clients with identified problems for further evaluation, intervention or treatment. In this case, 31% of the youths screened (Problem Risk and Severe Problem) would be referred. Or, policy might only refer clients with serious problems (Severe Problem, 11%) for additional services. In these examples, 69% or 89% (contingent upon adopted policy) of the people screened would not be referred for additional (and expensive) services.

Budgetary savings (dollars) would be large with no compromises in needy youths receiving appropriate evaluation and/or treatment services. Indeed, more needy youths would receive help. Without a screening program, there is usually more risk of over or under-utilization of additional professional services.

The ACDI-Corrections Version II scales identify the areas it screens. And, these scales (measures) are: 1. Truthfulness Scale, 2. Alcohol Scale, 3. Drugs Scale, 4. Violence (Lethality) Scale, 5. Distress Scale, 6. Adjustment Scale and 7. Stress Coping Abilities Scale.

Test Booklets

ACDI-Corrections Version II test booklets are provided free. These booklets contain 140 items (true/false and multiple choice) and are written at a 5th to 6th grade reading level. If a person can read the newspaper, they can read the ACDI-Corrections Version II. It takes on average 25 to 30 minutes to complete this test. Test booklets are available in English and Spanish.

Reports

In brief, ACDI-Corrections Version II reports summarize the youth’s self-reported history, explain what attained scale scores mean and offer specific score-related recommendations.

Within 2½ minutes of test data entry, automated (computer-scored) 4-page reports are printed on-site. These reports summarize a lot of information in an easily understood format. For example, these reports include a Version II profile (graph), which summarizes troubled youth findings at a glance. Also included are attained scale scores, an explanation of what each score means and specific score-related recommendations. In addition, significant items (direct admissions) are highlighted, and answers to a built-in interview (last sequence of multiple choice items) are presented. Emphasis is placed on having meaningful reports that are helpful and easily understood. To go directly to the example ACDI-Corrections Version II report click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Report link. After reviewing the report you can return to this section by clicking on the "Return to ACDI-CV II Reports Section" link.

"Provides a sound empirical basis for decisions"

Software

The ACDI-Corrections Version II is available on MS-DOS or Windows diskettes. MS-DOS diskettes contain all their own software. Windows diskettes require a one-time computer setup procedure after which Version II data diskettes are used to score and print reports. Training manuals are provided, and new test users can be walked through these scoring procedures over Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc.'s (Risk & Needs') telephone line at (602) 234-3506.

Proprietary ACDI-Corrections Version II diskettes (Version II) contain 25 or 50 test applications. These 3½" or 5¼" diskettes score, interpret and print reports on-site. Once an ACDI-Corrections Version II account is established, ordered diskettes are filled and mailed to users. Approximately 97% of orders are filled and mailed back to users the same day. When all test applications are used, diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs where the demographics (age, gender, and ethnicity) and test data are downloaded into Version II’s database for subsequent database analysis. The proprietary "delete names" program is activated by the test user with a few keystrokes to delete all juvenile names from diskettes before they are returned to Risk & Needs. Deleting all juvenile names insures protection of each youth’s confidentiality and compliance with HIPAA (federal regulation 45 C.F.R. 164.501).

The ACDI-Corrections Version II Orientation and Training Manual explains how the Version II system works and should be read by staff. The Version II Computer Operating Guide explains how to score tests, print or store reports and discusses other unique ACDI-Corrections Version II computer-related features.

Database

The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) system contains a proprietary built-in database. Earlier, it was noted that all Version II used diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs and the test data is downloaded into the Version II database. This expanding database allows ongoing research and test program summary features that were not available before. Ongoing research insures quality control. Testing program summaries provide for program self-evaluation.

Built-in database. Version II permits ongoing research and annual program summary -- at no additional cost. As discussed earlier, when the 25 or 50-test diskettes are used, these diskettes are returned to Risk & Needs, checked for viruses and downloaded into the expanding Version II database. Advantages of this proprietary database are many and include database (research) analysis and annual testing program summary reports.

Returned diskettes can be summarized on a state, department or agency basis -- at no additional cost to users. Annual summary reports provide information that permits testing program review. To critique an example summary report, click on the Annual Summary Reports link.

In summary, having all returned ACDI-Corrections Version II test data centrally filed at Risk & Needs' offices in the Version II database has many advantages. Database analysis permits ongoing cost efficient research that includes scale alpha coefficients, ANOVA, frequency distributions, correlations, and cross-tab statistics along with reliability, validity and accuracy determinations.

Annual Summary Reports

Risk & Needs can access each of its tests' built-in databases for statistical analysis and summarization of all tests administered in a year. Annual Summary Reports are prepared for state, department, agency and even some individual providers -- at no cost to them. These reports are provided as a professional courtesy to large volume test users. Summary reports include demographics, court-history when relevant, and test statistics (reliability, validity and accuracy). Has anyone offered to summarize your testing program? Annually? At no additional cost to you? Minimum testing volume for annual reports is 350 tests. There is no maximum limit. Risk & Needs' annual reports range in size from 350 tests to over 55,000 tests annually. An example Annual Summary Report can be viewed by clicking on this Annual Summary Reports link.

Reliability, Validity and Accuracy

The ACDI-Corrections Version II has a built-in proprietary database that insures inclusion of all administered tests in a confidential (no names) manner. Over 52,000 juveniles’ test data are represented in the ACDI and ACDI-Corrections Version II database. These reliability, validity and accuracy statistics are reported in the document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." Annual database analysis demonstrates that ACDI-Corrections Version II scales have very high reliability coefficients with minimum interscale correlations.

For example, internal consistencies (alpha coefficients) for ACDI-Corrections Version II scales are reported in the following table for some troubled youth (N=2,180) screened in the year 2002. This is only one among many year 2002 samples.

Reliability of the ACDI-CV II (N=2,180, 2002)

ACDI-Corrections
Version II Scales

Alpha
Coefficient

Significance
Level

Truthfulness

.86

p<.001

Alcohol

.90

p<.001

Drugs

.89

p<.001

Violence (Lethality)

.85

p<.001

Distress

.88

p<.001

Adjustment

.85

p<.001

Stress Coping

.90

p<.001

All Version II scales have alpha coefficients well above the professionally accepted standard of .75 and are highly reliable. All alpha coefficients are significant at the p<.001 level.

ACDI-Corrections Version II research extends over 12 years. Many studies have been conducted on thousands of juveniles using several validation methods. Early studies used criterion measures and were validated with other tests, e.g., Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) L-Scale and F-Scale, 16PF, Juvenile Profile, MMPI MacAndrews Scale, MMPI Psychopathic Deviate, MMPI Taylor Manifest Anxiety, MMPI Depression Scale, MMPI Manifest Hostility Scale, MMPI Delinquency Scale, MMPI Family Discord Scale, etc.

Much of this research is summarized in the document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." Subsequently, many discriminant and predictive validity database analysis based studies support Version II's reliability, validity and accuracy.  ACDI-Corrections Version II norms are based on over 52,000 juveniles (male and female). These norms are updated annually for each Version II scale. And, separate norms are available for gender (male and female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, Black, Hispanic). This database research is ongoing. To review an ACDI-Corrections Version II Research Study, click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Research Study link.

Relationships between ACDI and ACDI-Corrections Version II scales

The ACDI-Corrections Version II is a corrections version of the ACDI where the Violence Scale was added, but the other scales remained the same. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients between ACDI scale scores and ACDI-Corrections Version II scale scores are presented in the table below.

Scales

Truthfulness Scale

Alcohol
Scale

Drugs
Scale

Adjustment
Scale

Distress
Scale

Correlation Coefficient

r = .99

r = .99

r = .99

r = .99

r = .98

Two different samples of juveniles were used in this correlation analysis, and each youth took only the ACDI or the ACDI-Corrections Version II. To test the correlation between scale scores, the data for each scale was sorted in ascending order. This type of correlation was used because different respondents took different tests. But, because the scales and respondents were similar, the correlations are meaningful. There were 2,084 youths included in this analysis (1,042 for each test). Such high correlation coefficients demonstrate that ACDI and ACDI-Corrections Version II scales are reliable and valid.

Research Publication: Nebraska Probation Department's Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) selection process was automated with Risk & Needs tests. These tests include the Driver Risk Inventory-II, SAQ-Adult Probation III, Domestic Violence Inventory and the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This research is reported in Edward C. Birkel and David L. Wegner's article (2000). "Accurate Intensive Supervision Probation Selection: Revisited." American Probation and Parole Association, Perspectives, Vol. 24, #4 Fall, pp. 18-21. To read this article click on the Perspectives Research Article link.

Fairness goes beyond reliability and validity. The term applies to test accuracy for demographic groups like age, gender and ethnicity. Version II scale scoring equations are adjusted, as warranted, on an annual basis to insure fairness.

Staff Member Input: The ACDI-Corrections Version II is to be used in conjunction with experienced staff judgment. When available, juvenile court and adjustment records should be reviewed, as they can contain important information not provided or incorrectly provided by the juvenile. Experienced staff should also interview the client. For these reasons, the following statement is contained on each Version II report: "ACDI - Corrections Version II  results  are confidential and should be considered working hypotheses. No decision should be based solely upon these  results. The ACDI - Corrections Version II  is  to be used in conjunction with  experienced staff judgment." Space is also provided in ACDI-Corrections Version II reports for staff input.

UNIQUE FEATURES

The Truthfulness Scale measures how truthful and open the juvenile was while completing the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This scale identifies denial, problem minimization and faking. Many troubled youths attempt to minimize their problems. A Truthfulness Scale is a necessary component in contemporary juvenile assessment. The ACDI-Corrections Version II Truthfulness Scale has been validated with other tests, truthfulness studies and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) L and F-Scales. It consists of a number of items that most juveniles agree or disagree with. This important scale has been demonstrated to be reliable, valid and accurate. Much of this normative research is reported in the document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings."

Truth-Corrected Scores have proven to be very important in enhancing assessment accuracy. This proprietary truth correction program is comparable to the MMPI K-Scale correction methodology. The ACDI-Corrections Version II Truthfulness Scale has been correlated with the other six Version II scales. The Truth Correction equation then converts raw scores to Truth-Corrected scores. Truth Correction scores are more accurate than raw scores. Raw scores reflect what the juvenile wants you to know. Truth-Corrected scores reveal what the juvenile is trying to hide.

"Includes a Violence (Lethality) Scale"

The Violence (Lethality) Scale measures the juvenile’s propensity for using force to injure, damage or destroy. It identifies the youth’s danger to self and others. The burgeoning awareness of adolescent violence (lethality) in our society resulted in the inclusion of the Violence Scale in the ACDI-Corrections Version II. When screening violence or lethality potential is important, we recommend you use the ACDI-Corrections Version II.

The Distress Scale measures the youth’s experienced pain, suffering, anxiety and depression. The blending of symptom clusters is clear in the definition of dysphoria, i.e., a generalized feeling of anxiety, restlessness and depression. Distress incorporates unhappiness, dissatisfaction, worry, apprehension, etc. The Distress Scale also incorporates items symptomatic of anxiety and depression. Distress has broad applicability in adjustment, intervention, counseling and outcome.

The Stress Coping Abilities Scale measures how well the juvenile handles stress, tension and pressure. This scale goes beyond establishing whether or not a juvenile is experiencing stress. It determines how well the youth handles or copes with stress. How well a person handles stress can effect their adjustment and mental health. Stress exacerbates emotional and mental health symptomatology. Consequently, this scale is a non-introversive way to screen established (diagnosable) mental health problems. A juvenile scoring at or above the 90th percentile on the Stress Coping Abilities Scale should be referred for a more comprehensive evaluation and diagnosis, as warranted. This important area of inquiry is missed by most other juvenile screening instruments.

More than just another alcohol or drug test: In addition to alcohol and drugs, the ACDI-Corrections Version II assesses other important areas of inquiry like truthfulness, violence (lethality), distress, adjustment and stress coping abilities. The ACDI-Corrections Version II is designed specifically for juvenile (male and female) assessment. It provides the information needed for understanding juvenile attitudes and behavior.

Three ways to give Version II: The ACDI-Corrections Version II can be administered in three different ways: 1. Paper-Pencil test booklet format is the most popular testing procedure. English and Spanish test booklets are available. 2. Version II tests can be given directly on the computer screen. Some youth offender programs dedicate computers for on-screen testing. 3. Human voice audio is available for English and Spanish speaking youths. This involves a computer and a headset. The juvenile uses the up-down arrow keys. As the juvenile goes from question to answer with the arrow keys, that question or answer is highlighted on the monitor (screen) and simultaneously read to the juvenile. These three administration modes are discussed in the ACDI Orientation and Training Manual. Each test administration mode has advantages and some limitations. Risk & Needs offers these three test administration modes so test users can select the administration mode that is optimally suited to their needs.

"Demonstrated Reliability, Validity and Accuracy"

Reading Impaired Assessment: Reading impaired juveniles represent 20+ percent of youth tested. This represents a serious problem to many other juvenile tests. In contrast, Risk & Needs has developed a proprietary alternative for reading impaired assessment which is termed "human voice audio."

Human Voice Audio (in English or Spanish) helps resolve many reading problems along with cultural difference issues. Passive vocabularies are often greater than active vocabularies. Hearing items read often helps reduce both cultural and communication problems. As discussed earlier, "human voice audio" test presentation requires a computer, earphones and simple instructions regarding how to operate the up-down arrow keys located on the computer keyboard. Without this "human voice" option, a juvenile screening program could be limited.

Confidentiality: Risk & Needs encourages test users to delete juvenile names from diskettes before they are returned to Risk & Needs. This proprietary name deletion procedure involves a few keystrokes. Once juvenile names are deleted, they are gone and cannot be retrieved. Deleting juvenile names does not delete demographics or test data, which is downloaded into the ACDI-Corrections Version II database for subsequent analysis. This procedure insures juvenile confidentiality and compliance with HIPAA (federal regulation 45 C.F.R. 164.501).

Test Data Input Verification: This proprietary program allows the person that inputs the test data from the answer sheet into the computer to verify the accuracy of their data input. In brief, test data is input twice, and any inconsistencies between the first and second data entries are highlighted until corrected. When the first and second data entries match or are the same, the staff person may continue. Use of this data entry verification procedure is optional, yet it is strongly recommended by Risk & Needs.

Inventory of Scientific Findings: Much of the ACDI-Corrections Version II research has been gathered together in one document titled "ACDI: An Inventory of Scientific Findings." This document summarizes Version II research chronologically -- as the studies were completed.

This rather innovative chronological reporting format was established largely because of the Version II database, which permits annual database analysis of all tests administered. It also allows the reader to observe the evolution of the ACDI-Corrections Version II into its current state-of-the-art position.

To review an ACDI-Corrections Version II Research Study, click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Research Study link. This research study link is also provided at the end of this webpage.

Orientation and Training Manual: The ACDI-Corrections Version II Orientation and Training Manual (O&T Manual) explains how Version II works. This manual is a must read for staff that will be using Version II. O&T Manual content includes, but is not limited to, the following: testing instructions, explanation of how scores are derived, interpretation of how court and corrections information is used in the scoring methodology, description of unique Version II features and much much more.

Computer Operating Guide: Some computer operators want more information than others. Consequently, Risk & Needs provides a One-Page Quick Start, which includes basic instructions for scoring and a more comprehensive Computer Operating Guide. The Computer Operating Guide contains instructions for using MS-DOS as well as Windows software. This manual discusses hardware, software, scoring, printing reports and much more.

Staff Training: Risk & Needs staff is available to participate in ACDI-Corrections Version II training programs scheduled by test users in the United States. Large departments, agencies or statewide programs often are interested in Version II staff training. Sometimes, smaller agencies or departments get together for a joint training session on the ACDI-Corrections Version II. This training can include hands-on computer scoring. Risk & Needs gives attendees certificates attesting to their ACDI-Corrections Version II training.

Staff training is also provided on Fridays at Risk & Needs' Phoenix offices from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. or from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These training sessions are free. To participate, contact Risk & Needs at least ten days in advance. Participation is on a first call, first scheduled basis.

"Appropriate for Family and Juvenile Drug Courts"

ACDI-Corrections Version II Highlights

** ACDI-Corrections Version II **

  • Designed specifically for juveniles
  • Detects denial, minimization & faking
  • Comprehensive: 7 scales (measures)
  • Violence Scale measures lethality
  • Demonstrated reliability & validity
  • Available in English & Spanish
  • Built-in database insures on going research
  • More than just an alcohol or drug test
  • Specific score-related recommendations
  • Strong accountability of recommendations
  • Affordable: volume discounts available
  • Thirty-day money back guarantee

What users are saying ...

"The Adolescent Chemical Dependency Inventory (ACDI) format is focused, sequential, and easy to read. The overlay between the print-out and staff assessment has been a perfect fit. The staff response is 'right-on-target.' The scope of the analysis is broad, but concise. Our tested population falls into a normal, bell-curve distribution. The diskette allows us to give a same week guarantee, same day probability, and same hour feedback appropriate for the identified problems. Finally, the option for telephone consultation is of significant value if or when needed - which for this office has been perhaps twice over the past eleven months (in a word or two - its trouble free!)."

Porter County Juvenile Probation Office, Indiana

"We have been using the Adolescent Chemical Dependency Inventory (ACDI) in our standardized youth intake evaluations for two years now. The ACDI has had many positive advantages to our clients, staff and in terms of our mission, i.e., to provide the highest quality of service to those in need at affordable prices. The availability of test results within the same day enables us to focus our interviews and thereby save significant staff time. Test results are summarized in an easily understood manner regarding our client’s problems, situation and needs. Client risk levels are summarized at a glance and recommendations are both relevant and helpful. This objective and reliable information does provide us with a 'sound basis for decision making.' The ACDI shortens our intake procedures, aids us in cutting through denial and facilitates intervention."

National Council on Alcoholism, Inc., Arizona

"As you are aware we successfully piloted the ACDI-Corrections Version and SAQ-Adult Probation. Staff response was overwhelmingly positive. Ninety-six percent of survey responses indicated that SAQ-Adult Probation was a useful screening tool. Similar results were obtained for the ACDI-Corrections Version."

Department of Solicitor General, Nova Scotia

"The ACDI-Corrections Version II is used to evaluate youth entering our juvenile probation department. This test has been used in conjunction with investigations and direct probation and found to be quite useful in the determination of juvenile risk/needs. The profile it provides is user friendly and demonstratively reliable and valid."

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Administrative Office of the Courts/Probation

"I am writing to indicate how pleased we are with the ACDI. This screening instrument provides us with an enormous amount of invaluable information at a fraction of the cost of any alternatives. As you know, we provide troubled youth with a strenuous eight day program in the Northern Flinders Ranges and a reliable initial screening program for prospective participants is essential . . . Over time the ACDI will allow us to develop a much better psychological profile of the youth who experience Operation Flinders."

Operation Flinders, National Curriculum & Training, Australia

"Based on my experience in psychometric research, I can assure users of the ACDI-Corrections Version II that this questionnaire exceeds professional standards for test reliability and validity. It is a psychometrically sound and useful juvenile assessment instrument."

Doctorate Level Experimental Psychologist, Arizona

"Accurate ISP offender selection has been achieved by combining the strengths of Nebraska Probation Departments existing risk and needs worksheet with selected criminal court history and an automated assessment instrument or test. One of the four tests used in this study was the ACDI-Corrections Version II. It was shown to accurately predict substance abuse, identify distress and adjustment problems and measure stress coping problems . . . These results strongly support the reliability, validity and accuracy of the ACDI-Corrections Version II."

Perspectives, Volume 24, #4, Fall 2000

"I received the ACDI summary report as requested earlier this month, and wanted to thank you for not only your prompt response but also the information the report itself contains.

It is very difficult for small court systems, like ours, to have the means to compile statistical data on issues other than those which are legislatively mandated. So many times, needed data, such as which your summary covered, is unavailable due to the inability of the system to have the financial resources or technical knowledge base needed. The summary report gives me the ability to now approach community leaders with hard data confirming demographic trends and treatment needs that I am aware of but could not substantiate. Now, future treatment planning that would have not occurred because of lack of data will occur.

Again, thank you for making the summary report available as part of the cost of the instrument itself. We, at TASC, will continue to use the assessment instruments developed by your company and will also continue to recommend them for use in future Ohio Juvenile TASC programs."

TASC, Common Pleas Court, Ohio

"State-of-the-Art Juvenile Assessment"

Juvenile Violence Interview (JVI): Is a "structured interview" that consists of 60 multiple choice items. Each item has four answers. The answer selected for each item is printed in the JVI report. The JVI is available to Risk & Needs juvenile test users free. The JVI augments Risk & Needs juvenile tests and helps develop a violence profile. The JVI is not a test and is not to be used as a standalone assessment procedure or test. It takes 15 minutes to complete the JVI. For more information on the Juvenile Violence Interview click on the JVI link.

Test Unit Fee (Cost): ACDI-Corrections Version II cost information can be reviewed by clicking on the Test Unit Fee (Cost) link. There is only the one cost or charge, and that is the test unit fee. Everything else is included at no additional cost to the test user. This includes test booklets, answer sheets, training manuals, upgrades, ongoing database research, annual summary testing reports, staff training, and support services. Do not be misled by some test publishers' à la carte pricing like separate costs for each test administration as well as for each of the test-related items listed above. Instead of asking for the test administration cost, ask for the total cost involved in using a test. We believe Risk & Needs' one test unit fee is very affordable.

Free Examination Kit

A 1-test demo diskette is available on a 30-day cost free basis. Demo diskettes are in MS-DOS format so that all the software is contained on the diskette. Examination kits contain the demonstration diskette, test booklets and training materials. Risk & Needs does want the demonstration diskette and test booklet returned within 30 days. To request a free examination kit, click on the Free Examination Kit Request link.

How to Proceed: To become a Risk & Needs test user, click on the Agreement & Proposals link, click on the Print Client User Agreement button and fax the completed form to (602) 266-8227, or mail your completed form to Risk & Needs. Upon its receipt by Risk & Needs, you become a Risk & Needs test user and can order tests. Established or Risk & Needs test users can reorder tests by mail, telephone, fax or e-mail.

Other related links are listed for reference. They are available as needed.

Test Unit Fee (Cost) webpage link. Explains Risk & Needs' Test Unit Fees or Costs.
New Client Orders webpage link. Explains steps to become a "new Risk & Needs client."
How to Order webpage link. Explains how Risk & Needs tests can be ordered.

Additional information can be provided upon request. Contact Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, Arizona 85064-4828. Risk & Needs' telephone number is (602) 234-3506, our fax number is (602) 266-8227 and our e-mail address is hhl@riskandneeds.com.

Other Risk & Needs Tests

Risk & Needs has developed different tests for different offender populations and different assessment purposes. Adult and juvenile tests are available. The Tests Functionally Grouped link on the left side of this webpage includes most Risk & Needs tests. Similarly, the Tests Alphabetically Listed webpage contains most of Risk & Needs' tests.

Selecting a juvenile screening instrument or test

If you are selecting a juvenile assessment instrument, the following Comparison Checklist should prove helpful. This checklist itemizes important assessment and screening qualities. The "Other" column represents any other test you might want to compare to the ACDI-Corrections Version II.

TEST COMPARISON CHECKLIST

COMPARISON CATEGORIES

ACDI-CV II

Other

Designed Specifically for Juvenile Assessment

Yes

 

Test Reliability & Validity Research Provided

Yes

 

Test Completed in 30 Minutes

Yes

 

On-Site Reports within 3 Minutes

Yes

 

Truthfulness Scale to Detect Faking

Yes

 

Truth-Corrected Scores for Accuracy

Yes

 

Three Test Administration Options

Yes

 

     1. Paper-Pencil (English and Spanish)

Yes

 

     2. On Computer Screen (English and Spanish)

Yes

 

     3. Human Voice Audio (English and Spanish)

Yes

 

Delete Juveniles Names (confidentiality) Procedure

Yes

 
HIPAA (federal regulation) Compliant Yes  

Test Data Input Verification (accurate scoring)

Yes

 

Available in English and Spanish

Yes

 

Built-in Database

Yes

 

Annual Database Research (Free)

Yes

 

Annual Test Program Summary (Free)

Yes

 

Comprehensive Assessment (Seven Scales)

Yes

 

Specific Scale Score-Related Recommendations

Yes

 

Alcohol and Drugs Scales

Yes

 

Violence (Lethality) Scale

Yes

 

Distress Scale

Yes

 

Adjustment Scale

Yes

 

Stress Coping Abilities Scale

Yes

 

Large (50,000+) Research Database

Yes

 

Available in MS-DOS and Windows

Yes

 

Easily Understood and Helpful Reports

Yes

 
ASAM Compatible Recommendations Yes  
Staff Training (Free) Yes  
Examination Kits (Free) Yes  
Juvenile Violence Interview (Free) Yes  
Thirty-Day Money Back Guarantee Yes  
Very Affordable Test Unit Fee Yes  

 

ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II
SCALE INTERPRETATION

An example ACDI-Corrections Version II report follows this discussion of scale interpretation. It is provided as a ready reference to augment this dialogue. There are several levels of ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) interpretation ranging from viewing Version II as a self-report to interpreting scale elevations and interrelationships. The following table is a beginning point for interpreting Version II scores.

ACDI-Corrections Version II Scale Ranges

Risk Category

Risk Range
Percentile

Total
Percentage

Low Risk 0 - 39% 39%
Medium Risk 40 - 69% 30%
Problem Risk 70 - 89% 20%
Severe Problem 90 - 100% 11%

With reference to the above table, a problem is not identified until a scale score is at the 70th percentile or higher. Elevated scale scores refer to percentile scores that are at or above the 70th percentile. Severe (serious) problems are identified by scale scores at or above the 90th percentile. Severe problems represent the highest 11 percent of juveniles evaluated with Version II. Version II has been normed on over 50,000 troubled youths. And, this normative sample continues to expand with each Version II test that is administered.

SCALE INTERPRETATION

1. Truthfulness Scale: Measures how truthful the juvenile was while completing the test. It identifies guarded and defensive youths who attempt to fake good. Scores at or below the 89th percentile mean that all ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) scales are accurate. Scores in the 70th to 89th percentile are accurate because they have been Truth-Corrected. Truthfulness Scale scores at or above the 90th percentile mean that all Version II scales are inaccurate (invalid) because the juvenile was overly guarded and manifesting denial, read things into Version II test items that aren’t there, was minimizing problems, or was caught faking answers. Youths with a reading impairment might also invalidate their tests with Truthfulness Scale scores in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range. The reason for invalidation can usually be determined with a few questions regarding the juvenile’s schooling, reading ability and motivation. If not consciously deceptive, youths with elevated Truthfulness Scale scores are uncooperative, fail to understand test items or have a need to appear in a good light.

Truthfulness Scale scores at or below the 89th percentile indicate that all other scale scores are accurate. When reviewing a Version II report, one of the first things to check is the Truthfulness Scale score. A Truthfulness Scale score at or above the 90th percentile does not occur by chance.

2. Violence (Lethality) Scale: Measures the juvenile’s propensity for using force to injure, damage or destroy. This scale identifies youths that are a danger to themselves and others. Violence is operationally defined as the expression of hostility and rage through physical force. Violence is aggression in its most extreme and unacceptable form. Elevated scorers are demanding, overly sensitive to perceived criticism and insightless about how they express their anger/hostility. They often have poor school records and feel emotionally isolated.

Severe problem scorers are typically erratic, angry, easily provoked and dangerous. A particularly unstable and perilous situation exists when the youth manifests an elevated Violence Scale score in conjunction with an elevated Alcohol Scale and/or Drugs Scale score. Here, we have increased probability of acting out behaviors combined with impaired judgment.

In combination with an elevated Violence Scale, an elevated Distress Scale score increases the probability of suicidal ideation. Elevated Adjustment Scale and/or Stress Coping Abilities Scale scores in conjunction with an elevated Violence Scale score provide insight regarding co-determinants and possible treatment alternatives. The more of these scales that are elevated with the Violence Scale, the worse the prognosis. Elevated scale interrelationships are important when interpreting scale elevations. Any scale scores in the Severe Problem range should not be ignored, and this is especially true of the Violence Scale. The Violence Scale score can be interpreted independently or in combination with other Version II scales.

3. Alcohol Scale: Measures alcohol use and/or abuse. "Alcohol" refers to beer, wine and other liquors. An elevated (70th to 89th percentile) Alcohol Scale is indicative of an emerging drinking problem. An Alcohol Scale score in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range identifies serious alcohol-related problems.

A history of alcohol-related arrests could result in an Alcohol Scale score in the Low or Medium Risk range. To determine if the juvenile is a "recovering" alcoholic, Version II users should check items #57 (admission to drinking problem), #131 (self-description of drinking) and #133 (the "recovery" question). For reference, other items also could be checked (e.g., #15, 21, 33, 39, 51, 96, 132). Admissions to these items are printed on page 3 of the Version II report.

In conjunction with an elevated Alcohol Scale, an elevated Violence Scale represents a dangerous combination, e.g., a violent predisposition with impaired judgment. When both the Alcohol and Drugs Scales are elevated, the highest score usually represents the juvenile’s substance of choice. When both are in the Severe Problem range, explore polysubstance abuse. An elevated Distress Scale with an elevated Alcohol Scale could reflect emerging suicidal ideation or a frustration - aggressive explosive acting out. A higher Alcohol Scale score may be a focal issue; whereas, a higher Distress Scale might be indicative of a troubled youth’s attempt to "self-medicate." An elevated Adjustment Scale in combination with an elevated Alcohol Scale helps identify co-determinants. The amplitude of an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score and an elevated Alcohol Scale score are important. An elevated (70th to 89th percentile) Stress Coping Abilities Scale score reflects impaired stress handling abilities, and drinking may be of an "escape-avoidance" nature; whereas, a score in the Severe Problem range suggests the presence of an identifiable (diagnosable) mental health disorder. In the latter case drinking may be part of the psychopathology. In summary, the Alcohol Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.

4. Drugs Scale: Measures illicit drug use and abuse. The Drugs Scale measures the severity of drug abuse. "Drugs" refers to marijuana, crack, cocaine, ice, LSD, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin. This scale is independent of the Alcohol Scale described above. An elevated (70th to 89th percentile) Drugs Scale score is indicative of an emerging drug problem. Elevated Drugs Scale scores do not happen by chance. A Drugs Scale score in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range identifies severe drug-related problems.

A history of drug arrests could result in a Drugs Scale score in the low or moderate risk range. To determine if the juvenile is a "recovering" drug abuser, Version II users should check items #29 (drug use admission), #78 (drug abuse problem) and #133 (the "recovery" question). For reference, other items could also be checked (e.g., #23, 85, 53, 91). Admissions to these items are printed on page 3 of the Version II report.

In intervention and treatment settings, the youth’s Drugs Scale score helps work through denial. And, an elevated Drugs Scale score in conjunction with other elevated Version II scores magnifies the severity of the other elevated scores. For example, an elevated Violence Scale in conjunction with an elevated Drugs Scale score identifies a very dangerous person.

When both the Drugs and Alcohol Scales are elevated, the higher score represents the youth’s substance of choice. When both of these scores are in the Severe Problem range, polysubstance abuse is indicated.

An elevated Distress Scale in combination with an elevated Drugs Scale reflects a troubled youth on the verge of being overwhelmed. The height of the Distress Scale is important as scores in the Severe Problem range can be indicative of suicidal/homicidal ideation. As noted earlier with alcohol, an elevated Adjustment Scale in combination with an elevated Drugs Scale helps identify co-determinants. And, the height of an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale and an elevated Drugs Scale score are important. An elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score reflects impaired stress coping abilities and drug use may be experimental; whereas, a score in the Severe Problem range points to an identifiable (diagnosable) mental health disorder. In this case (Severe Problem), drug use/abuse is likely a part of the symptomatology. In summary, the Drugs Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales. In most cases, a drug problem (elevated scale score) magnifies the risk associated with other elevated Version II scale scores.

5. Distress Scale: Measures the youth’s pain, suffering, anxiety and depression. Distress incorporates unhappiness, dissatisfaction, worry and pain. Distress is the most common reason for juveniles to voluntarily seek counseling. Distress has broad applications in adjustment, intervention, counseling and outcome. And, it often serves as the beginning point in clinical inquiry. The magnitude (or severity) of the Distress Scale is important. Elevated scores indicate some-thing is wrong. The youth is concerned, bothered and upset. Distress Scale scores in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range indicate the youth is hurting, on the verge of being overwhelmed and is becoming desperate.

A Severe Problem Distress Scale in conjunction with any other Version II scale in the Severe Problem range is a malignant sign and needs to be dealt with carefully. This is the profile of a suicidal/homicidal prone individual. The Distress Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.

6. Adjustment Scale: Measures the youth’s ability to adapt, conform and function. This scale recognizes personal and social stressors at home, school and in one’s peer group relationships. Juvenile adjustment requires modification of the youth’s attitudes and behavior. Stressors vary widely from the home and school environment (along with anxiety, frustration and competition) to a myriad of emotion provoking events. When the Adjustment Scale is elevated, carefully review other Version II scales. Other Version II scales include Violence, Substance Abuse, Distress and Stress Coping Abilities.

An elevated Adjustment Scale suggests one level of intervention (e.g., lifestyle adjustment); whereas, a score in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range suggests other more fundamental intervention options. An elevated Distress Scale score with an elevated Adjustment Scale score is suggestive of poor emotional morale in a problem prone environmental milieu, e.g., school, home and/or peer group. An elevated Adjustment Scale in combination with an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale reflects a troubled youth who doesn’t cope well with his environment. In this case, the youth might benefit most from stress management training, emotional support of endeavor and lifestyle adjustment. The Adjustment Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.

7. Stress Coping Abilities Scale: Measures the youth’s ability to cope with stress, anxiety and pressure. It is now accepted that stress exacerbates symptoms of mental and emotional problems. Thus, an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score in conjunction with other elevated Version II scales helps explain the youth’s situation. When a juvenile doesn’t handle stress well, other existing problems are often exacerbated.

Such problem augmentation applies to substance abuse, behavioral acting-out and attitudinal problems. And, an elevated Stress Coping Abilities Scale score can also exacerbate emotional and mental health symptomatology. When a Stress Coping Abilities Scale score is in the Severe Problem (90th to 100th percentile) range, it is very likely that the juvenile has a diagnosable mental health problem. In these instances, referral to a certified/licensed mental health professional is warranted for a diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan. The Stress Coping Abilities Scale can be interpreted independently or in combination with other ACDI-Corrections Version II scales.

* * * * *

In conclusion, it was noted that there are several "levels" of ACDI-Corrections Version II interpretation ranging from viewing Version II as a self-report to interpreting scale elevations and interrelationships. Scale scores can be interpreted individually. Staff can then put Version II findings within the context of the juvenile’s life situation.

FOR EASY REFERENCE

The following links provide quick access to some of the unique ACDI-Corrections Version II features that are described above.

7 Scale Measures Truth Corrected Scores
Database Free Examination Kit
Reliability & Validity Scale Interpretation
Staff Training Reading Impaired
Assessment
Test Comparison Checklist Research Study
Example Report Test Unit Fee
(Cost)

For More Information

Additional ACDI-Corrections Version II information can be provided upon request by contacting Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, Arizona 85064-4828. Our telephone number is (602) 234-3506, our fax number is (602) 266-8227, and our e-mail address is hhl@riskandneeds.com.

Example Report

An example ACDI-Corrections Version II report has been included for reference. Although "Example Report" is a hypothetical person, this four-page report shows how information is summarized and presented. These reports are easy to read and provide specific scale-related recommendations. On the first page, the ACDI-Corrections Version II PROFILE summarizes the youth’s responses at a glance. Scale paragraphs, on pages 2 and 3, give the juvenile's scale score, explain what that score means and present score-related recommendations. Near the bottom of page 3 is space for the assessor's observations and comments. Sometimes, a staff member obtains important information from another source (e.g., victim, court history, other records, etc.) that influences their recommendation. That’s OK. That’s why space is provided for staff member comments.

Page 4 summarizes significant items. These are direct admissions or unusual responses. Significant items often give considerable focus and insight to the assessment process. Towards the bottom of page 4 are the Multiple Choice answers, with all of the youth’s opinions and biases. This sequence of items (#131 to #140) are multiple choice items, and the juvenile's selected answers are shown. Sometimes, it’s helpful to compare the youth's objective, empirically established scores with their subjective answers. Multiple Choice items are not Truth-Corrected.

EXAMPLE REPORT
ACDI-CORRECTIONS VERSION II

The ACDI-Corrections Version II (Version II) example report is presented for your review. Each Version II report is organized around the same outline or format, yet these reports are highly individualized.  Each report is 4 pages in length. And, all Version II reports are scored and printed within 2½ minutes from data entry.

The first page of the Version II report begins with the juvenile's name and some demographics, e.g., age, gender, ethnicity and education. The ACDI-Corrections Version II Profile (graph) summarizes Version II scores at glance. The first page concludes with the juvenile's reported court history.


                     ACDI - CORRECTIONS VERSION II

                     *****************************
                         CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
                     *****************************


NAME             : Example Report
ID #             : 00000000000
AGE: 16      SEX : Male
ETHNICITY/RACE   : Caucasian
EDUCATION/GRADE  : 10th Grade
DATE ACDI SCORED : 12/11/2004


ACDI - Corrections Version II  results  are confidential and should be
considered working hypotheses. No decision should be based solely upon
these  results.  The ACDI - Corrections Version II  is  to be  used in
conjunction with  experienced staff judgment.



MEASURES         %ile                     ACDI-CV II PROFILE
--------         ----       +---------------+-----------+-------+---+
                            -   LOW RISK    -   MEDIUM  -PROBLEM-MAX-
                            -               -           -       -   -
TRUTHFULNESS      55        ***********************.....-.......-...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
ALCOHOL           90        *************************************...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
DRUGS             87        ***********************************.-...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
VIOLENCE          83        **********************************..-...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
DISTRESS          86        ***********************************.-...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
ADJUSTMENT        70        *****************************.......-...-
                            -               -           -       -   -
STRESS COPING     77        *******************************.....-...-
                            +---------------+-----------+-------+---+
                            0               40          70      90 100
                            ----------- PERCENTILE SCORES -----------


              ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT
              -----------------------------------------

Age at First Arrest.......... 15   Times in Juvenile Detention...... 1
Times on Probation........... 1    Juvenile Court Hearings.......... 1
Probation Revocations........ 0    Alcohol-Related Arrests.......... 1
Total Number of Arrests...... 1    Drug-Related Arrests............. 1


Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
 ACDI-Corrections Version II Copyright (c) 1998. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

The second page of the Version II report presents a summary paragraph for four of Version II's scales (measures): Truthfulness Scale, Alcohol Scale, Drugs Scale, and Violence Scale. Each paragraph presents the youth's scale score, explains what that score means and offers specific score-related recommendations.

 NAME: Example Report            -2-                 ACDI-CV II REPORT

 * * SUMMARY PARAGRAPHS EXPLAINING CLIENT'S ATTAINED SCALE SCORES * *
     ------------------------------------------------------------

TRUTHFULNESS SCALE: MEDIUM RISK RANGE               RISK PERCENTILE:55
This youth's  response pattern  on  the  Truthfulness  Scale is in the
Medium  Risk  (40  to  69th percentile)  range.  The  ACDI-Corrections
Version II profile is accurate. However,  there is a tendency for this
youth  to  deny  common  problems  and  to portray  self  in an overly
favorable  light.  Specific  questions will  usually  be answered more
accurately than open-ended or general type questions. The Truthfulness
Scale is accurate and other ACDI-Corrections Version  II  scale scores
are accurate. This individual has adequate reading  skills and appears
to have answered test items reasonably accurately.

ALCOHOL SCALE: MAXIMUM RISK RANGE                   RISK PERCENTILE:90
This juvenile's score on the  Alcohol  Scale  is  in  the High Risk or
Severe Problem (90 to 100th  percentile)  range.  Either  this indivi-
dual's use of alcohol  (beer, wine or  liquor) is  out of  control  or
this juvenile is a recovering (alcohol problem, but has stopped drink-
ing) alcoholic. Serious  alcohol  abuse  is indicated  and many  self-
report  indicators of  alcohol abuse are evident. This juvenile has an
alcohol-related   problem.   RECOMMENDATIONS:   Annual   re-evaluation
throughout probation  is  recommended. Options include: substance (al-
cohol)  abuse outpatient counseling,  chemical  dependency  treatment,
intensive outpatient counseling services. If recovering, this juvenile
should  continue  in  treatment,  counseling   or   12-step  community
program involvement. Relapse risk is high. Family counseling should be
encouraged.

DRUGS SCALE: PROBLEM RISK RANGE                     RISK PERCENTILE:87
This juvenile's response pattern on the Drugs Scale  is in the Problem
Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range. Either drug use  is not controlled
or this person is recovering (drug  problem, but  has  stopped using).
Drug (marijuana, cocaine, LSD,  heroin, etc.) abuse is indicated. Drug
use or abuse is likely a  focal  issue in  this  juvenile's adjustment
problems. An established  pattern  of  drug abuse is indicated. Annual
re-evaluation  is   desirable.  RECOMMENDATIONS:  Moderately intensive
probation  including   personal  reporting  and participation in drug-
related counseling  (individual or group) or 12-step community program
involvement should be  considered. If recovering, this juvenile should
continue in treatment,  counseling or  Young  People in NA. Relapse is
possible. Family counseling  could  be  helpful.  A  firm probationary
structure combined with monitored counseling attendance and compliance
is desirable.

VIOLENCE SCALE: PROBLEM RISK RANGE                  RISK PERCENTILE:83
This juvenile's response pattern  on  the  Violence Scale  is  in  the
Problem Risk (70 to 89th percentile) range. When frustrated or angered
this youth can all to easily become  agitated, uncontrolled, threaten-
ing or even combative. Whether  boisterous,  distraught or disorderly,
this client's behavior  has  an unpredictable ugly or violent quality.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Participation  in a group counseling program designed
to resolve  anger/violent  behavior  is recommended. Regular probation
incorporating  personal  reporting  is  appropriate.  Review the other
ACDI-Corrections Version II scales to assess the range of contributing
stressors and areas of  conflict  or concern.  This is a  problem risk
 

The third page completes the scale paragraphs for the Distress Scale, Adjustment Scale and the Stress Coping Abilities Scale. Page 3 concludes with a reproduction of all Version II answers.

 NAME: Example Report            -3-                 ACDI-CV II REPORT

profile. This troubled youth needs help.

DISTRESS SCALE: PROBLEM RISK RANGE                  RISK PERCENTILE:86
This juvenile's score on the Distress Scale is in the Problem Risk (70
to 89th  percentile) range.  Distress  incorporates  both anxiety  and
depression and represents the most common reason for seeking  counsel-
ing. Symptoms include uneasiness, apprehension, unhappiness and  vary-
ing degrees of anger, guilt or shame. Distress is contributing to this
person's emotional and adjustment problems. This juvenile is distress-
ed or disturbed and needs help.  RECOMMENDATIONS:  This is a  troubled
youth that  should talk to  somebody about existing problems  and con-
cerns. Counseling  (individual, family or group) is  recommended. With
regard to distress, moderately intensive probation  including partici-
pation in counseling (as warranted) is recommended.

ADJUSTMENT SCALE: PROBLEM RISK RANGE                RISK PERCENTILE:70
This juvenile's  response  pattern on the  Adjustment  Scale is in the
Problem Risk  (70 to 89th percentile) range.  Many indicators  of dis-
satisfaction and maladjustment (e.g., acting-out, runaway, poor grades
or drop-out, substance abuse, delinquency, etc.) are evident.  This is
a  troubled  youth with  authority  problems and concerns.  Supportive
counseling  and  clarification of  personal,  academic and  vocational
goals would help.  This juvenile  is likely  described as  ineffective
and/or  unconcerned.  This troubled youth needs help. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Medium-intensity probation, and counseling (family or group) should be
considered. A decision regarding suitable residential placement may be
needed. This juvenile functions best in  consistently structured  set-
tings characterized by clearly established expectations and consistent
consequences.

STRESS COPING SCALE: PROBLEM RISK RANGE             RISK PERCENTILE:77
High levels of experienced stress and/or below  average stress  coping
abilities  are indicated.  Stress can  exacerbate  other  symptoms and
contribute to adjustment difficulties. This person manifests  impaired
stress  coping  abilities.  This person's  score on the Stress  Coping
Abilities Scale is in the Problem Risk  (70 to 89th percentile) range.


                             * * * * *


                        ACDI-CV II RESPONSES
                        --------------------
     1- 50 TTTTTTTTTT FTTFFTTTTT TFTTTTFFTT FFTFFTTFFT FTFTTFTTTF
    51-100 FTTFFTTFFT TTFTTFFTTT FTTFFTTFFT TFFTTFFTTF FTTFFTFTFT
   101-140 2323213222 2212221221 3221222223 4444444444








Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, AZ 85064-4828
 ACDI-Corrections Version II Copyright (c) 1998. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


 

The fourth page contains significant items (direct admissions and unusual answers) to the Alcohol Scale, Drugs Scale, Violence (Lethality) Scale, Distress Scale and the Adjustment Scale. Significant items are followed by the Multiple Choice items, (items #131-140), which consists of 10 multiple choice questions. Each of these items has four possible answers, and the answer selected by the juvenile is printed in the report. This helps the assessor determine the juvenile's answers to items of interest to the staff member. Page 4 concludes with space provided for staff member observations and comments, staff member signature and date.

NAME: Example Report            -4-                 ACDI-CV II REPORT

SIGNIFICANT ITEMS:  These  answers are  the youth's  responses.  They
represent direct admissions or unusual answers which when explored in
interview  often help in  understanding the juvenile's  motivation.

ALCOHOL                            DRUGS
-------                            -----
 21. Drinking becoming a problem     5. Has used drugs excessively
 33. Drinking problem in last year  17. Many close friends use drugs
 45. Family and social problems     23. At times worries about drug use
 57. Admits to a drinking problem   29. Uses and sometimes abuses drugs
 89. Attended AA meetings for help  47. Used before school or at lunch
                                    53. Attended NA or CA meetings
                                    85. Had counseling for drug use

VIOLENCE                            DISTRESS
--------                            --------
  6. Short temper and angers quickly  8. Unhappy with life
 30. So angry can't control self     20. Frequently discouraged
 36. More dangerous than age peers   26. Feels alone and unhappy
 48. Violent temper tantrums         44. Last year: unhappy & depressed
 60. Admits a gang member            62. States unhappy & needs help
 65. States a violent person         69. Thinks about death & suicide
                                     81. Wants to talk with a counselor

ADJUSTMENT
----------
  4. More unhappy than age peers
 16. "Turned off" in school
 70. Unhappy at home

MULTIPLE CHOICE: These answers reflect the youth's opinions with
all their biases, defensiveness and minimization. Sometimes comparison
of a youth's subjective answers with their objective scale scores
facilitates insight and client understanding.

131. Drinking is not a problem     136. Drug use no problem
132. No need for alcohol treatment 137. No need for drug treatment
133. Not a recovering person       138. Rates 9-10 (severe distress)
134. Never been a gang member      139. Not suicidal or homicidal
135. Denies any family problems    140. No need to see a counselor



                             * * * * *

OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS______________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

________________________________       ______________
   STAFF MEMBER SIGNATURE                   DATE            (TEST # 1 )


 

 

We hope this ACDI-Corrections Version II webpage has been interesting and helpful. Additional information can be provided upon request by writing Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc., P.O. Box 44828, Phoenix, Arizona 85064-4828. Our telephone number is (602) 234-3506, our fax number is (602) 266-8227 and our e-mail address is hhl@riskandneeds.com.
 

FOR EASY REFERENCE

The following links provide quick access to some of the ACDI-Corrections Version II features described earlier.
ACDI-CV II (Beginning) Why use the ACDI-CV II?
7 ACDI-CV II Scales Violence (Lethality) Scale
Reliability and Validity Truthfulness Scale
What Users are Saying Truth-Corrected Score
3 Ways to Administer Test Data Input Verification
Scale Interpretation Distress Scale
Test Comparison Checklist Free Examination Kit
ACDI-CV II Research Study Stress Coping Abilities Scale
Test Unit Fee (Cost) Staff Training



The research study titled "Juvenile Offender Assessment: Validation of the ACDI-Corrections Version II" is an important validation study. There were 8,405 juvenile offenders in this research. Impressive reliability, validity and accuracy are demonstrated. This study demonstrates that the ACDI-Corrections Version II is a reliable, valid and accurate juvenile offender test. To examine this study click on the ACDI-Corrections Version II Research Study link.

Test Unit Fee
(Cost)
Test Comparison Checklist Juvenile Violence Interview Research Study Nebraska Probation Study How To Proceed

 

 


How to Proceed
Annual Reports | Staff Training
How to Order Tests |
Scroll Articles
Research Support | Power Point Tutorials | Other Website Links
Website Recommendations
Guest Log | Contact Us


Copyright 2003 - Risk & Needs Assessment, Inc. - All Rights Reserved